From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Add napi_sycnhronize() to sync with napi poll Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 11:26:22 +1000 Message-ID: <1192670782.12879.7.camel@pasglop> References: <1192513792.19073.23.camel@pasglop> <20071016115318.0fc36af3@freepuppy.rosehill> <1192589522.11899.130.camel@pasglop> <47157EA4.1000500@garzik.org> <1192591481.11899.134.camel@pasglop> <20071017083107.6a1b1bd3@freepuppy.rosehill> <1192658654.6783.43.camel@pasglop> <1192669323.13993.33.camel@localhost.localdomain> Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Stephen Hemminger , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Roland Dreier , "David S. Miller" , Jeff Garzik , linuxppc-dev list To: Josh Boyer Return-path: Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:41537 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752863AbXJRB1d (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Oct 2007 21:27:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1192669323.13993.33.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 20:02 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > k, trying again, leaving the actual patch below. In the above patch > description, you still call it __napi_synchronize. In the patch > below, > it's napi_syncronize. > > I was just trying to point out to whomever commits this patch that the > actual description should probably be fixed. Yup, I noticed finally :-) I think whoever commits can fix it up (it's likely that it's sch patch that gets commited anyway). Ben.