From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Urs Thuermann <urs.thuermann@gmx.de>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
davem@davemloft.net, acme@ghostprotocols.net,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] - trivial - Improve appletalk checksum calculation
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 14:01:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1193605297.26695.121.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ygfk5p7vvq7.fsf@janus.isnogud.escape.de>
On Sun, 2007-10-28 at 21:18 +0100, Urs Thuermann wrote:
> I have written a short test program to show this and tested it on i686
> (gcc-4.2.2) and powerpc (gcc-3.4.5) without optimization and with -O6.
Thanks for that.
> BTW, shouldn't unsigned long be replaced by unsigned int to avoid
> 64-bit operations one some platforms?
probably unsigned long should be u16.
Compiled, untested.
diff --git a/net/appletalk/ddp.c b/net/appletalk/ddp.c
index 7c0b515..c3890cc 100644
--- a/net/appletalk/ddp.c
+++ b/net/appletalk/ddp.c
@@ -922,25 +922,19 @@ static int atrtr_ioctl(unsigned int cmd, void __user *arg)
* Checksum: This is 'optional'. It's quite likely also a good
* candidate for assembler hackery 8)
*/
-static unsigned long atalk_sum_partial(const unsigned char *data,
- int len, unsigned long sum)
+static u16 atalk_sum_partial(const unsigned char *data,
+ int len, u16 sum)
{
- /* This ought to be unwrapped neatly. I'll trust gcc for now */
while (len--) {
- sum += *data;
- sum <<= 1;
- if (sum & 0x10000) {
- sum++;
- sum &= 0xffff;
- }
- data++;
+ sum += *data++;
+ sum = ((sum & 0x8000) >> 15) | ((sum & 0x7fff) << 1);
}
return sum;
}
/* Checksum skb data -- similar to skb_checksum */
-static unsigned long atalk_sum_skb(const struct sk_buff *skb, int offset,
- int len, unsigned long sum)
+static u16 atalk_sum_skb(const struct sk_buff *skb, int offset,
+ int len, u16 sum)
{
int start = skb_headlen(skb);
int i, copy;
@@ -1010,13 +1004,13 @@ static unsigned long atalk_sum_skb(const struct sk_buff *skb, int offset,
static __be16 atalk_checksum(const struct sk_buff *skb, int len)
{
- unsigned long sum;
+ u16 sum;
/* skip header 4 bytes */
sum = atalk_sum_skb(skb, 4, len-4, 0);
/* Use 0xFFFF for 0. 0 itself means none */
- return sum ? htons((unsigned short)sum) : htons(0xFFFF);
+ return cpu_to_be16(sum ? sum : 0xFFFF);
}
static struct proto ddp_proto = {
*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-28 21:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-22 19:36 [PATCH] - trivial - Improve appletalk checksum calculation Joe Perches
2007-10-23 0:35 ` David Miller
2007-10-23 1:36 ` Joe Perches
2007-10-23 1:43 ` David Miller
2007-10-23 1:53 ` Joe Perches
2007-10-23 3:51 ` Herbert Xu
2007-10-28 20:18 ` Urs Thuermann
2007-10-28 21:01 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2007-10-29 2:40 ` Joe Perches
2007-10-23 3:30 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-23 3:39 ` Joe Perches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1193605297.26695.121.camel@localhost \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=urs.thuermann@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).