From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
To: Ryousei Takano <takano-ryousei@aist.go.jp>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, shemminger@linux-foundation.org,
t.kudoh@aist.go.jp
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] NET_SCHED: PSPacer qdisc module
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 10:15:30 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1195658130.4437.17.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071121.191840.07671434.takano@axe-inc.co.jp>
On Wed, 2007-21-11 at 19:18 +0900, Ryousei Takano wrote:
> This patch includes the PSPacer (Precise Software Pacer) qdisc
> module, which achieves precise transmission bandwidth control.
> You can find more information at the project web page
> (http://www.gridmpi.org/gridtcp.jsp).
Good stuff.
I have not read your paper - There are NICs out there (chelsio comes to
mind) which claim to do pacing and have shown impressive numbers with
TCP. Is your approach similar? Are there patents involved by some of
these hardware vendors? (It would not be suprising if they exist).
The advantage with NICs is they have very good control of the timing
(clock granularity being extremely important in cases like this) - what
were your measurements based on i.e what clock source did you use on
Linux?
Also, the idea of using a PAUSE frame to add gaps is interesting, but
you should note that in linux a qdisc may be attached to any network
device and this for example maybe a PPP device etc. What would you use
for gaps in that case?
I apologize if the answers are in your papers - i just glossed over.
cheers,
jamal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-21 15:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-21 10:18 [RFC][PATCH 1/3] NET_SCHED: PSPacer qdisc module Ryousei Takano
2007-11-21 11:48 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-11-22 9:51 ` TAKANO Ryousei
2007-11-21 15:15 ` jamal [this message]
2007-11-22 2:54 ` Ryousei Takano
2007-11-22 3:06 ` TAKANO Ryousei
2007-11-21 15:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-11-22 9:59 ` TAKANO Ryousei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1195658130.4437.17.camel@localhost \
--to=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=t.kudoh@aist.go.jp \
--cc=takano-ryousei@aist.go.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).