From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: RE: [PATCH] e1000: Fix for 32 bits platforms with 64 bits resources Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 06:52:12 +1100 Message-ID: <1196279532.13230.14.camel@pasglop> References: <20071116073821.548CCDDDF4@ozlabs.org> <36D9DB17C6DE9E40B059440DB8D95F5203DF7871@orsmsx418.amr.corp.intel.com> Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Kok, Auke-jan H" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Jeff Garzik To: "Brandeburg, Jesse" Return-path: Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:38484 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754695AbXK1Twh (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:52:37 -0500 In-Reply-To: <36D9DB17C6DE9E40B059440DB8D95F5203DF7871@orsmsx418.amr.corp.intel.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 10:47 -0800, Brandeburg, Jesse wrote: > > > The side effect is that I removed the assignments to the netdev > > fields mem_start, mem_end and base_addr, which are totally useless > > for PCI devices. > > also, concerning this, ifconfig shows the output of these variables, I > don't think we want to blatantly remove them, as it is actually removing > information that is, if not used, at least displayed to user space. It's not the right place to have that information and there is no room in the user space field to fit more than 32 bits on 32 bits platforms so I'd rather remove it. It's really only for ISA drivers that have user configurable addresses. Ben.