netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* doubt in e1000_io_write()
@ 2008-01-11 15:13 Jeba Anandhan
  2008-01-11 18:41 ` Kok, Auke
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeba Anandhan @ 2008-01-11 15:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev

Hi all,
i have doubt in e1000_io_write().

void
e1000_io_write(struct e1000_hw *hw, unsigned long port, uint32_t value)
{
        outl(value, port);
}


kernel version: 2.6.12.3


Even hw structure has not been used, why it has been passed into
e1000_io_write function?

Thanks
Jeba


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: doubt in e1000_io_write()
  2008-01-11 15:13 doubt in e1000_io_write() Jeba Anandhan
@ 2008-01-11 18:41 ` Kok, Auke
  2008-01-11 19:35   ` Breno Leitao
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kok, Auke @ 2008-01-11 18:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeba Anandhan; +Cc: netdev

Jeba Anandhan wrote:
> Hi all,
> i have doubt in e1000_io_write().
> 
> void
> e1000_io_write(struct e1000_hw *hw, unsigned long port, uint32_t value)
> {
>         outl(value, port);
> }
> 
> 
> kernel version: 2.6.12.3
> 
> 
> Even hw structure has not been used, why it has been passed into
> e1000_io_write function?

2.6.12.3? why do you care? that code is probably long gone... was that function
even used?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: doubt in e1000_io_write()
  2008-01-11 18:41 ` Kok, Auke
@ 2008-01-11 19:35   ` Breno Leitao
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Breno Leitao @ 2008-01-11 19:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kok, Auke; +Cc: Jeba Anandhan, netdev

Hello Auke, 
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 10:41 -0800, Kok, Auke wrote:
> > Even hw structure has not been used, why it has been passed into
> > e1000_io_write function?
> 
> 2.6.12.3? why do you care? that code is probably long gone... was that function
> even used?

I noticed that this also happens on upstream netdev-2.6 branch. 
Moreover the function e1000_write_reg_io() from e1000_hw.c is the only
function that calls e1000_io_write().

I write a small patch that fixes it.

diff -uNp e1000.old/e1000_hw.c e1000/e1000_hw.c
--- e1000.old/e1000_hw.c        2008-01-11 14:14:36.000000000 -0500
+++ e1000/e1000_hw.c    2008-01-11 14:13:36.000000000 -0500
@@ -6654,8 +6654,8 @@ e1000_write_reg_io(struct e1000_hw *hw,
     unsigned long io_addr = hw->io_base;
     unsigned long io_data = hw->io_base + 4;
 
-    e1000_io_write(hw, io_addr, offset);
-    e1000_io_write(hw, io_data, value);
+    e1000_io_write(io_addr, offset);
+    e1000_io_write(io_data, value);
 }
 
 /******************************************************************************
diff -uNp e1000.old/e1000_hw.h e1000/e1000_hw.h
--- e1000.old/e1000_hw.h        2008-01-11 14:13:00.000000000 -0500
+++ e1000/e1000_hw.h    2008-01-11 14:15:47.000000000 -0500
@@ -427,7 +427,7 @@ int32_t e1000_read_pcie_cap_reg(struct e
 void e1000_pcix_set_mmrbc(struct e1000_hw *hw, int mmrbc);
 int e1000_pcix_get_mmrbc(struct e1000_hw *hw);
 /* Port I/O is only supported on 82544 and newer */
-void e1000_io_write(struct e1000_hw *hw, unsigned long port, uint32_t value);
+void e1000_io_write(unsigned long port, uint32_t value);
 int32_t e1000_disable_pciex_master(struct e1000_hw *hw);
 int32_t e1000_check_phy_reset_block(struct e1000_hw *hw);
 
diff -uNp e1000.old/e1000_main.c e1000/e1000_main.c
--- e1000.old/e1000_main.c      2008-01-11 14:14:36.000000000 -0500
+++ e1000/e1000_main.c  2008-01-11 14:13:23.000000000 -0500
@@ -4919,7 +4919,7 @@ e1000_read_pcie_cap_reg(struct e1000_hw 
 }
 
 void
-e1000_io_write(struct e1000_hw *hw, unsigned long port, uint32_t value)
+e1000_io_write(unsigned long port, uint32_t value)
 {
        outl(value, port);
 }

Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-01-11 19:35 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-01-11 15:13 doubt in e1000_io_write() Jeba Anandhan
2008-01-11 18:41 ` Kok, Auke
2008-01-11 19:35   ` Breno Leitao

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).