netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
To: "Timo Teräs" <timo.teras@iki.fi>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Fixing SA/SP dumps on netlink/af_key
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:25:57 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1200533157.4451.86.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <478E1479.3020204@iki.fi>

On Wed, 2008-16-01 at 16:28 +0200, Timo Teräs wrote:
[..]
> Creating a separate af_key patch would not be a big problem. I was
> just hoping avoiding it as the xfrm_state / xfrm_policy changes
> modify the API and requires changing af_key also.

The way dumping is done by xfrm_user is consistent across all netlink
not just ipsec. Thats why i said it had broader implications. 
OTOH, theres a clear issue with pf_key.

> No. I'm not creating second copies of the SADB/SPD entries. The entries
> are just added to one more list.

Ah, sorry - yes, that sounds reasonable.
So what happens if i delete an entry; does it get removed from the list?
Also what happens on modification?

> If more entries are added, you can get notifications of them.

how would a user app (example racoon) appropriately deal with it?
Example an entry sits in the dump-list, it gets deleted - an event gets
generated user-space and later that entry shows up in user space dump.

cheers,
jamal


  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-17  1:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-13 12:26 [RFC][PATCH] Fixing SA/SP dumps on netlink/af_key Timo Teräs
2008-01-16 13:52 ` jamal
2008-01-16 14:28   ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17  1:25     ` jamal [this message]
2008-01-16 22:58   ` Herbert Xu
2008-01-17  1:39     ` jamal
2008-01-17  2:17       ` Herbert Xu
2008-01-17  5:54         ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17 11:11           ` Herbert Xu
2008-01-17 12:21             ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17 12:26             ` jamal
2008-01-17 12:42           ` jamal
2008-01-17 12:50             ` Herbert Xu
2008-01-17 13:18               ` jamal
2008-01-17 13:31               ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17 21:34                 ` Herbert Xu
2008-01-18  6:45                   ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-18 14:08                     ` jamal
2008-01-17  6:27     ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17  7:16       ` David Miller
2008-01-17  7:38         ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17  7:59           ` David Miller
2008-01-17  8:11             ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17  8:49               ` David Miller
2008-01-17  9:20                 ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17  9:31                   ` David Miller
2008-01-17  9:38                     ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17  9:44                       ` David Miller
2008-01-17 10:01                         ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17 10:06                           ` David Miller
2008-01-17 11:00                             ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17 11:08                               ` David Miller
2008-01-17 12:37                                 ` Timo Teräs

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1200533157.4451.86.camel@localhost \
    --to=hadi@cyberus.ca \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=timo.teras@iki.fi \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).