From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
To: "Timo Teräs" <timo.teras@iki.fi>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Fixing SA/SP dumps on netlink/af_key
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:42:30 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1200573750.4508.29.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <478EED98.6080603@iki.fi>
On Thu, 2008-17-01 at 07:54 +0200, Timo Teräs wrote:
> You listen for the events. It is guaranteed that if the dumping code
> does return the entry to be deleted, the deletion notification will
> occur after that dump entry.
Ok, sounds reasonable - as long as there is a known order for
occurances, then there will be no ambiguity.
I am assuming that the same ordering will happen with
updates/modifications?
To go back to what i suggested earlier - is it possible to have this in
two stages? First pfkey with expected behavior being the same as current
netlink; then later the optimizations you are talking about.
Looking at the pfkey RFC one more time, heres a funny quote:
"
The dump message is used for debugging
purposes only and is not intended for production use.
"
One thing Dave mentioned thats extremely important is to ensure no ABI breakage.
Think of racoon 0.6 which knows nothing of this; it should continue to work.
Dave: One reason i paid attention to this is because it was on your TODO
list from netconf 2005 ;-> It has just been sitting in the background
memory cells since.
cheers,
jamal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-17 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-13 12:26 [RFC][PATCH] Fixing SA/SP dumps on netlink/af_key Timo Teräs
2008-01-16 13:52 ` jamal
2008-01-16 14:28 ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17 1:25 ` jamal
2008-01-16 22:58 ` Herbert Xu
2008-01-17 1:39 ` jamal
2008-01-17 2:17 ` Herbert Xu
2008-01-17 5:54 ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17 11:11 ` Herbert Xu
2008-01-17 12:21 ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17 12:26 ` jamal
2008-01-17 12:42 ` jamal [this message]
2008-01-17 12:50 ` Herbert Xu
2008-01-17 13:18 ` jamal
2008-01-17 13:31 ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17 21:34 ` Herbert Xu
2008-01-18 6:45 ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-18 14:08 ` jamal
2008-01-17 6:27 ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17 7:16 ` David Miller
2008-01-17 7:38 ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17 7:59 ` David Miller
2008-01-17 8:11 ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17 8:49 ` David Miller
2008-01-17 9:20 ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17 9:31 ` David Miller
2008-01-17 9:38 ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17 9:44 ` David Miller
2008-01-17 10:01 ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17 10:06 ` David Miller
2008-01-17 11:00 ` Timo Teräs
2008-01-17 11:08 ` David Miller
2008-01-17 12:37 ` Timo Teräs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1200573750.4508.29.camel@localhost \
--to=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=timo.teras@iki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).