From: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: rick.jones2@hp.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Netperf TCP_RR(loopback) 10% regression in 2.6.24-rc6, comparing with 2.6.22
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:51:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1200984664.3151.253.camel@ymzhang> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080121.222214.184161381.davem@davemloft.net>
On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 22:22 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:07:19 +0800
>
> > I am wondering if UDP stack in kernel has a bug.
>
> If one server binds to INADDR_ANY with port N, then any other socket
> can be bound to a specific IP address with port N. When packets
> come in destined for port N, the delivery will be prioritized
> to whichever socket has the more specific and matching binding.
What does 'more specific' mean here? I assume 127.0.0.1 should be
prioritized before 0.0.0.0 which means packets should be queued to
127.0.0.1 firstly.
>
> So the kernel is fine.
But kernel now queues packets to 0.0.0.0.
>
> Netperf just needs to be more careful in order to handle this kind of
> case more cleanly.
It's better if kernel works more reasonable.
-yanmin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-22 6:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1199871330.3298.132.camel@ymzhang>
2008-01-11 9:30 ` Netperf TCP_RR(loopback) 10% regression in 2.6.24-rc6, comparing with 2.6.22 Zhang, Yanmin
2008-01-11 17:56 ` Rick Jones
2008-01-14 3:11 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-01-14 17:46 ` Rick Jones
2008-01-22 5:24 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-01-22 6:07 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-01-22 6:22 ` David Miller
2008-01-22 6:51 ` Zhang, Yanmin [this message]
2008-01-22 7:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-01-22 6:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-01-22 6:52 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-01-22 7:32 ` David Miller
2008-01-22 18:36 ` Rick Jones
2008-01-23 0:42 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-01-23 3:25 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-01-14 8:44 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-01-14 9:21 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-01-14 9:38 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-01-14 10:53 ` Herbert Xu
2008-01-16 0:34 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-01-16 7:15 ` Zhang, Yanmin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1200984664.3151.253.camel@ymzhang \
--to=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).