From: "Michael Chan" <mchan@broadcom.com>
To: "Tony Battersby" <tonyb@cybernetics.com>
Cc: "David Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TG3 network data corruption regression 2.6.24/2.6.23.4
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:11:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1203448265.13495.95.camel@dell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47BB00EC.3010607@cybernetics.com>
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 11:16 -0500, Tony Battersby wrote:
> iSCSI
> performance drops to 6 - 15 MB/s when the 3Com NIC is doing heavy rx
> with light tx,
That's strange. The patch should only affect TX performance slightly
since we are just turning off SG for TX. Please take an ethereal trace
to see what's happening and compare with a good trace.
> but remains at a decent 115 MB/s when the 3Com NIC is
> doing heavy tx with light rx. When I revert Herbert's patch instead
> of
> applying the patch above, I get 115 MB/s in both cases. (With a stock
> unpatched kernel, the test fails almost immediately because the iSCSI
> control PDUs are corrupted, causing the TCP connection to be dropped.)
>
> The SysKonnect NIC that does not exhibit this problem has a chip that
> says "BCM5411KQM" "TT0128 P2Q" and "56975E".
>
I think this is the 5700, but please send me the tg3 output that
identifies the chip and the revision. Something like this:
eth2: Tigon3 [partno(BCM95705) rev 3003 PHY(5705)] (PCI:66MHz:32-bit) 10/100/1000Base-T Ethernet 00:10:18:04:57:0d
eth2: RXcsums[1] LinkChgREG[0] MIirq[0] ASF[0] WireSpeed[0] TSOcap[1]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-19 19:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-18 22:41 TG3 network data corruption regression 2.6.24/2.6.23.4 Tony Battersby
2008-02-19 0:32 ` Michael Chan
2008-02-19 0:35 ` David Miller
2008-02-19 1:04 ` Michael Chan
2008-02-19 16:16 ` Tony Battersby
2008-02-19 19:11 ` Michael Chan [this message]
2008-02-19 19:26 ` Tony Battersby
2008-02-19 22:14 ` Tony Battersby
2008-02-19 23:52 ` Michael Chan
2008-02-20 15:01 ` Tony Battersby
2008-02-20 1:38 ` Matt Carlson
2008-02-20 16:13 ` Tony Battersby
2008-02-20 21:29 ` Tony Battersby
2008-02-20 23:04 ` Tony Battersby
2008-02-20 23:08 ` David Miller
2008-02-20 23:17 ` Michael Chan
2008-02-20 3:45 ` Herbert Xu
2008-02-20 15:18 ` Tony Battersby
2008-04-15 0:12 ` Matt Carlson
2008-04-15 15:39 ` Tony Battersby
2008-04-16 3:31 ` David Miller
2008-04-16 15:40 ` Michael Chan
2008-04-16 20:17 ` Matt Carlson
2008-04-16 21:00 ` Tony Battersby
2008-04-18 6:20 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1203448265.13495.95.camel@dell \
--to=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tonyb@cybernetics.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).