From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Harvey Harrison Subject: Re: New sparse warning in net/mac80211/debugfs_sta.c Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 02:16:33 -0800 Message-ID: <1203588993.20345.27.camel@brick> References: <1203587699.17534.135.camel@johannes.berg> <20080221.020343.190715910.davem@davemloft.net> <1203588498.20345.20.camel@brick> <20080221.021228.09081608.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: johannes@sipsolutions.net, joe@perches.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.183]:8008 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754915AbYBUKQS (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2008 05:16:18 -0500 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id v27so4429313wah.23 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 02:16:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20080221.021228.09081608.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 02:12 -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Harvey Harrison > Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 02:08:18 -0800 > > > Really, that should have read: > > > > Sparse warning introduced since -rc2: > > ..etc > > > > Harvey's best guess is this commit... > > I think the commit you originally blamed got added in 2.6.24, > so it would be very difficult for it to cause a post-2.6.25-rc2 > regression :-) > I don't view it as a regression, just seeing if warning maintainers incrementally when new sparse warnings get in ends up being well received. In addition to trying to lower the noise level of the existing warnings, might as well try to stem the tide of new ones. Harvey