From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: Phy read timeout in ibm_new_emac driver Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:18:48 +1000 Message-ID: <1208927928.9060.18.camel@pasglop> References: <6a6049b80804160349q42120b4bs1c0db49ea5ad055d@mail.gmail.com> <1208347791.6958.279.camel@pasglop> <200804230706.32641.super.firetwister@gmail.com> Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, ppc-dev To: Markus Brunner Return-path: Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:36276 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751373AbYDWFS7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Apr 2008 01:18:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200804230706.32641.super.firetwister@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 07:06 +0200, Markus Brunner wrote: > On Wednesday 16 April 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > Somebody knows off hand what the standard says the timeout should be ? > > Anyone? > > I didn't find any documentation on the standard, but I had a look at other > drivers. > au1000_eth.c waits 20 ms (20 * 1ms) in mdio_read. > bfin_mac.c waits 500 * 1us in mdio_poll. > In both functions the last delay before the timeout is useless, like in > new_emac. Not nice, but timeouts shouldn't occur anyway. > > new emac probably doesn't wait long enough, but 20ms seems to be a bit too > long. I just send Jeff a patch doubling the timeouts. Cheers, Ben.