From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Williams Subject: Re: [RFC] make wext wireless bits optional and deprecate them Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 11:24:46 -0400 Message-ID: <1211210686.12187.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1211026337.3827.25.camel@johannes.berg> (sfid-20080517_154639_384202_6D3479C2) <1211032475.6252.2.camel@johannes.berg> <1211117795.686.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1211199368.6252.19.camel@johannes.berg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Marcel Holtmann , netdev , Jean Tourrilhes , linux-wireless , Linux Kernel list To: Johannes Berg Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:37087 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762130AbYESP27 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2008 11:28:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1211199368.6252.19.camel@johannes.berg> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 14:16 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > Instead of testing for wireless/, best thing would probably be to call > > SIOCGIWRANGE on the device and if it returns EOPNOTSUP then it's not > > wireless. Some drivers may have to load firmware to figure out > > supported rates and encryption capabilities, but to be honest, NM does > > this to detect wireless devices and I haven't run into any issues in 4 > > years using it. If there are issues with drivers, then we need to fix > > the driver too. > > I was about to propose calling SIOCGIWNAME since that is what > wireless-tools do and that linux/wireless.h indicates. Hmm; NAME is pretty useless. That's fine to do, I guess WEXT requires that NAME return _something_ at least. NAME should never ever be used for anything more, but since wireless-tools appears to do this that's fine. Dan