From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Woodhouse Subject: Re: network interface *name* alias support? Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 10:33:52 +0100 Message-ID: <1211621632.31212.73.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> References: <4836FB73.2010709@intel.com> <4837026A.6000702@hp.com> <1211569604.11907.37.camel@perihelion> <20080523225435.GT20815@postel.suug.ch> <1211603155.11907.79.camel@perihelion> <20080524051630.GD20890@auslistsprd01.us.dell.com> <4837DCA4.5070806@katalix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Matt Domsch , Jan Engelhardt , Jon Masters , Thomas Graf , Rick Jones , "Kok, Auke" , johnathan@jonmasters.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: James Chapman Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:43212 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753327AbYEXJeG (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 May 2008 05:34:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4837DCA4.5070806@katalix.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, 2008-05-24 at 10:15 +0100, James Chapman wrote: > Wouldn't it be better to fix any applications that can't handle > renamed devices? _Are_ there any such applications? Other than NetworkManager crapping itself when the device name is too long, I'm not aware of any. -- dwmw2