From: Eli Cohen <eli@dev.mellanox.co.il>
To: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@voltaire.com>
Cc: Jan-Bernd Themann <THEMANN@de.ibm.com>,
OpenFabrics General <general@lists.openfabrics.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>,
Vladimir Sokolovsky <vlad@mellanox.co.il>
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] [PATCH] net/inet_lro: remove setting skb->ip_summed when not LRO-able
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:30:05 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1214397005.23583.60.camel@mtls03> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4862304D.2050306@voltaire.com>
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 14:47 +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
> > no, what I meant is that it is only not needed at that particular
> > place as the packet is not handled by LRO. Without this line the
> > driver can set an individual value for each SKB that is not
> > aggregated if wished. For example when the packet is not a valid IP
> > packet. However, removing all ip_summed fields impacts the fragment
> > lro mode. There we have to set some value for not aggregated packets.
> > The SKBs are generated within the LRO engine. If desired (and if there
> > is HW that wants to use that) we can pass that value for each provided
> > fragment. This would add one additional paramter to the already 8
> > parameters of __lro_proc_segment. That is of course possible.
> OK, understood, both points.
>
> Eli, lets add to this patch a comment in inet_lro.h saying that the
> value of lro_mgr->ip_summed is ignored by the core lro code for drivers
> that use the non fragmented mode.
We already have this comment:
struct net_lro_mgr {
...
u32 ip_summed; /* Set in non generated SKBs in page mode */
I think we should use have it something like that:
...
/*
* Set for generated SKBs in that are not added to
* the frag list in fragmented mode
*/
u32 ip_summed;
What do you think?
> Also for the ipoib patch, lets not set
> this value.
Agree.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-25 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1214318386.23583.37.camel@mtls03>
2008-06-25 9:26 ` [ofa-general] [PATCH] net/inet_lro: remove setting skb->ip_summed when not LRO-able Or Gerlitz
2008-06-25 11:28 ` Jan-Bernd Themann
2008-06-25 11:47 ` Or Gerlitz
2008-06-25 12:10 ` Jan-Bernd Themann
2008-06-25 12:15 ` Jan-Bernd Themann
2008-06-25 12:30 ` Eli Cohen [this message]
2008-06-25 13:01 ` Or Gerlitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1214397005.23583.60.camel@mtls03 \
--to=eli@dev.mellanox.co.il \
--cc=THEMANN@de.ibm.com \
--cc=general@lists.openfabrics.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ogerlitz@voltaire.com \
--cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
--cc=vlad@mellanox.co.il \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).