From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kasper Sandberg Subject: Re: 8169 Intermittent ifup Failure Issue With RTL8102E Chipset in Intel's New D945GCLF Atom Board (Not the Initial Modprobe Crash, Another Problem) Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 14:53:56 +0200 Message-ID: <1215435236.11909.121.camel@localhost> References: <4861800B.90703@nscus.com> <20080625213142.GA29890@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <48640535.2050000@nscus.com> <20080626215918.GC2555@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Michael Grollman , netdev@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org To: Francois Romieu Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080626215918.GC2555@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 23:59 +0200, Francois Romieu wrote: > (linux-pci Cced) > > Michael Grollman : > [...] > > Per instructions, I built an 2.6.26-rc8 system on the target Intel > > hardware, and was able to re-recreate the intermittent failure of the 8201. > > When in failure mode, the lspci -vx' display of the pci registers of the > > 8102 is as follows: > > > > 01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8101E PCI > > Express Fast Ethernet controller (rev ff) (prog-if ff) > > !!! Unknown header type 7f > > 00: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff > > 10: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff > > 20: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff > > 30: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff > > Bad mojo. > > Can you reproduce the failure of the driver or lspci when you > boot the kernel with "pci=nommconf" (assuming CONFIG_PCI_MMCONFIG is > set in your .config) or "pci=conf1" (if CONFIG_PCI_DIRECT is instead). > > [...] > > Let me know if there is anything else I can do to collect information on > > this situation. > > The (gzipped) content of your .config. > > Kasper, could you check if you have the same symptoms with > 2.6.26-rc8 (once your rendering is finished of course) ? > Sorry for the delay, i had to do an onsite thing in another country, so i first see your message now. Would it be okay if i took rc9 instead? also, i saw you posted a set of patches to sync more with realteks code, is this something you would like me to test too, or aswell? (remember, i have the 8111c). Btw, a thought just crossed my mind as to a possible reason why this might be happening, i was googling around, and it seems the TWO nic's are supposed to have some sort of hardware bonding thing, could it be because such stuff isnt handled? mvh. Kasper Sandberg