From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Dillow Subject: Re: [PATCH] typhoon: use request_firmware Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:57:36 -0400 Message-ID: <1217303856.28682.21.camel@obelisk.thedillows.org> References: <1217170232.3537.6.camel@jaswinder.satnam> <1217209400.22789.47.camel@obelisk.thedillows.org> <1217215009.2970.7.camel@jaswinder.satnam> <1217248585.22789.58.camel@obelisk.thedillows.org> <1217253260.17632.6.camel@jaswinder.satnam> <1217295498.28682.16.camel@obelisk.thedillows.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: LKML , becker@scyld.com, davidpmclean@yahoo.com, Jeff Garzik , netdev , David Woodhouse To: Jaswinder Singh Return-path: Received: from smtp.knology.net ([24.214.63.101]:60842 "EHLO smtp.knology.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753171AbYG2D5k (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:57:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1217295498.28682.16.camel@obelisk.thedillows.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 21:38 -0400, David Dillow wrote: > Now you keep one copy per NIC, which doubles the memory usage. Just use > static struct firmware *typhoon_fw; Just to clarify, loading it per-NIC wastes memory when there is more than one card in the box. I've got two in one of my test boxes, hence the count above. I've heard tale of many more of these stuffed into a single box, though there's better ways to achieve their aims these days.