From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Zhang, Yanmin" Subject: Re: tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:01:46 +0800 Message-ID: <1219107706.8781.6.camel@ymzhang> References: <48A086B6.2000901@linux-foundation.org> <20080811.141501.01468546.davem@davemloft.net> <1219025114.25933.6.camel@ymzhang> <48A98228.9090006@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ilpo =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=E4rvinen?= , David Miller , Netdev , LKML To: Christoph Lameter Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:24561 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751475AbYHSBCv (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Aug 2008 21:02:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <48A98228.9090006@linux-foundation.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 09:07 -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: > Zhang, Yanmin wrote: > > > Other regressions on other machines are similar. > > There are AIM7 regressions that are similar to tbench. > > 2.6.22 28436 > 2.6.26 23064 Mostly, AIM7 has about 4~5% regression on my machines. As AIM7 result is stable, so 4% is big.