From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, jeff@garzik.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, alexander.h.duyck@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] pkt_sched: restore multiqueue prio scheduler
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 09:39:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1219585163.4698.43.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080824075331.GA2721@ami.dom.local>
On Sun, 2008-24-08 at 09:53 +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 12:09:42PM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > I think you missed the email from Dave earlier, either that or I am
> > not understanding something and if I am feel free to explain. My
> > understanding is that when we assign a new qdisc via tc the
> > qdisc/transmit queues end up with a configuration kind of like what
> > Dave has on slide 7 at
> > (http://vger.kernel.org/~davem/davem_seattle08.pdf). Adding more
> > queues doesn't resolve anything since I am still going through the
> > same qdisc regardless of how many queues I have. The changes to the
> > dequeue portion of this qdisc are the most important part for this
> > change since I need them to keep the qdisc from jamming up in a
> > dequeue/requeue loop if the packet at the head of the qdisc needs to
> > go to a stopped hardware transmit queue.
>
> I guess, Jamal meant additional, backup queues,
right; in the driver - but even that may be unnecessary.
With current controls being per qdisc instead of per netdevice,
the hol fear is unfounded.
You send and when hw cant keep up, you block just the one hwqueue.
While hwqueue is blocked, you can accumulate packets in the prio qdisc
(hence my statement it may not be necessary to accumulate packets in
driver).
On tx completion when hwqueue has more space, you check your backup
queues; and send those first before opening up path from above.
And to your other statement; if you use basic skb->priority to hwqueue
mapping, then you wouldnt need an extra action.
cheers,
jamal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-24 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-22 0:51 [PATCH 1/3] LRO: fix return code propogation Jeff Kirsher
2008-08-22 0:51 ` [PATCH 2/3] netlink: nal_parse_nested_compat was not parsing nested attributes Jeff Kirsher
2008-08-22 10:18 ` David Miller
2008-08-22 17:40 ` [PATCH 2/3] netlink: nla_parse_nested_compat " Duyck, Alexander H
2008-08-27 14:52 ` Thomas Graf
2008-08-27 18:09 ` Duyck, Alexander H
2008-08-22 0:51 ` [PATCH 3/3] pkt_sched: restore multiqueue prio scheduler Jeff Kirsher
2008-08-22 10:16 ` David Miller
2008-08-22 14:30 ` jamal
2008-08-22 22:19 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-08-23 0:01 ` Alexander Duyck
2008-08-23 0:40 ` David Miller
2008-08-23 1:37 ` Alexander Duyck
2008-08-23 5:12 ` Herbert Xu
2008-08-23 6:35 ` Alexander Duyck
2008-08-23 7:07 ` Herbert Xu
2008-08-23 8:23 ` David Miller
2008-08-23 8:15 ` David Miller
2008-08-23 0:33 ` David Miller
2008-08-23 8:47 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-08-23 16:31 ` Alexander Duyck
2008-08-23 16:49 ` jamal
2008-08-23 19:09 ` Alexander Duyck
2008-08-24 7:53 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-08-24 13:39 ` jamal [this message]
2008-08-24 19:19 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-08-24 19:27 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-08-24 19:59 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-08-24 20:18 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-08-25 0:50 ` David Miller
2008-08-25 3:03 ` Alexander Duyck
2008-08-25 6:16 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-08-25 9:36 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-08-25 0:49 ` David Miller
2008-08-25 6:06 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-08-25 7:48 ` David Miller
2008-08-25 7:57 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-08-25 8:02 ` David Miller
2008-08-25 8:25 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-08-25 8:35 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-08-22 10:20 ` [PATCH 1/3] LRO: fix return code propogation David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1219585163.4698.43.camel@localhost \
--to=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).