From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcel Holtmann Subject: Re: btusb suspend/resume bug... Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:17:49 +0200 Message-ID: <1221668269.6782.8.camel@californication> References: <20080916.155123.181085856.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-bluetooth-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: David Miller Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080916.155123.181085856.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hi Dave, > Marcel, others, please bring some kind of closure to this > regression list entry: > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11442 > Subject : btusb hibernation/suspend breakage in current -git > Submitter : Rafael J. Wysocki > Date : 2008-08-25 11:37 (19 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth&m=121966402012074&w=4 > Handled-By : Oliver Neukum > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth&m=121967226027323&w=4 > > There is a patch, it is tested, so the only course of action at > this point is to merge the fix or declare that this really isn't > a regression. > > My impression is the later, because the driver btusb is replacing > doesn't handle suspend/resume either. Isn't that right? the original patch that I had was expecting changes in the USB subsystem that I deemed to much at this point. However Oliver got a patch that would make it work without the USB changes. I am still testing it. Let me see if I get some free minutes during the PlumbersConf to get this fully tested. Actually hci_usb is handling suspend/resume to some degree. So we could count this as regression. Regards Marcel