From: KOVACS Krisztian <hidden@sch.bme.hu>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: kaber@trash.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 10/16] Don't lookup the socket if there's a socket attached to the skb
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2008 17:43:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1222962200.14079.19.camel@este> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081001.085104.193726318.davem@davemloft.net>
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 08:51 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: KOVACS Krisztian <hidden@sch.bme.hu>
> Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 17:38:20 +0200
>
> > The problem is that if you include the if() test then you have to
> > include the lookup call as well and that's different for TCP/UDP.
>
> No, I only mean to make a helper for this construct:
>
> if (unlikely(skb->sk)) {
> ...
> }
>
> so, something like:
>
> static inline struct sock *sock_skb_steal(struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> if (unlikely(skb->sk)) {
> struct sock *sk = skb->sk;
>
> skb->destructor = NULL;
> skb->sk = NULL;
> return sk;
> }
> return NULL;
> }
>
> and then also get rid of the ifdefs at the place where
> these calls are made (TCP and UDP).
Something like this?
- 8< -
Use the socket reference cached in the skb if present. The iptables
TPROXY rule for example does a socket lookup early and attaches the
socket reference to the skb. So in the respective TCP/UDP/DCCP rcv()
routine we don't do a lookup but simply steal the socket reference from
the skb.
Signed-off-by: KOVACS Krisztian <hidden@sch.bme.hu>
---
include/net/sock.h | 12 ++++++++++++
net/dccp/ipv4.c | 7 ++++---
net/dccp/ipv6.c | 9 +++++----
net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 6 ++++--
net/ipv4/udp.c | 5 +++--
net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c | 9 +++++----
net/ipv6/udp.c | 5 +++--
7 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index 75a312d..b60fdc1 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -1324,6 +1324,18 @@ static inline void sk_change_net(struct sock *sk, struct net *net)
sock_net_set(sk, hold_net(net));
}
+static inline struct sock *sock_skb_steal(struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ if (unlikely(skb->sk)) {
+ struct sock *sk = skb->sk;
+
+ skb->destructor = NULL;
+ skb->sk = NULL;
+ return sk;
+ }
+ return NULL;
+}
+
extern void sock_enable_timestamp(struct sock *sk);
extern int sock_get_timestamp(struct sock *, struct timeval __user *);
extern int sock_get_timestampns(struct sock *, struct timespec __user *);
diff --git a/net/dccp/ipv4.c b/net/dccp/ipv4.c
index 882c5c4..6968ac8 100644
--- a/net/dccp/ipv4.c
+++ b/net/dccp/ipv4.c
@@ -811,9 +811,10 @@ static int dccp_v4_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb)
/* Step 2:
* Look up flow ID in table and get corresponding socket */
- sk = __inet_lookup(dev_net(skb->dst->dev), &dccp_hashinfo,
- iph->saddr, dh->dccph_sport,
- iph->daddr, dh->dccph_dport, inet_iif(skb));
+ if (likely((sk = sock_skb_steal(skb)) == NULL))
+ sk = __inet_lookup(dev_net(skb->dst->dev), &dccp_hashinfo,
+ iph->saddr, dh->dccph_sport,
+ iph->daddr, dh->dccph_dport, inet_iif(skb));
/*
* Step 2:
* If no socket ...
diff --git a/net/dccp/ipv6.c b/net/dccp/ipv6.c
index 5e1ee0d..97d1405 100644
--- a/net/dccp/ipv6.c
+++ b/net/dccp/ipv6.c
@@ -805,10 +805,11 @@ static int dccp_v6_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb)
/* Step 2:
* Look up flow ID in table and get corresponding socket */
- sk = __inet6_lookup(dev_net(skb->dst->dev), &dccp_hashinfo,
- &ipv6_hdr(skb)->saddr, dh->dccph_sport,
- &ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr, ntohs(dh->dccph_dport),
- inet6_iif(skb));
+ if (likely((sk = sock_skb_steal(skb)) == NULL))
+ sk = __inet6_lookup(dev_net(skb->dst->dev), &dccp_hashinfo,
+ &ipv6_hdr(skb)->saddr, dh->dccph_sport,
+ &ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr, ntohs(dh->dccph_dport),
+ inet6_iif(skb));
/*
* Step 2:
* If no socket ...
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
index 1ac4d05..e879037 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
@@ -1577,8 +1577,10 @@ int tcp_v4_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb)
TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->flags = iph->tos;
TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->sacked = 0;
- sk = __inet_lookup(net, &tcp_hashinfo, iph->saddr,
- th->source, iph->daddr, th->dest, inet_iif(skb));
+ if (likely((sk = sock_skb_steal(skb)) == NULL))
+ sk = __inet_lookup(net, &tcp_hashinfo, iph->saddr,
+ th->source, iph->daddr, th->dest, inet_iif(skb));
+
if (!sk)
goto no_tcp_socket;
diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
index 28c3c31..874bceb 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
@@ -1198,8 +1198,9 @@ int __udp4_lib_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct hlist_head udptable[],
return __udp4_lib_mcast_deliver(net, skb, uh,
saddr, daddr, udptable);
- sk = __udp4_lib_lookup(net, saddr, uh->source, daddr,
- uh->dest, inet_iif(skb), udptable);
+ if (likely((sk = sock_skb_steal(skb)) == NULL))
+ sk = __udp4_lib_lookup(net, saddr, uh->source, daddr,
+ uh->dest, inet_iif(skb), udptable);
if (sk != NULL) {
int ret = 0;
diff --git a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
index e85f377..c44b6d7 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
@@ -1681,10 +1681,11 @@ static int tcp_v6_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb)
TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->flags = ipv6_get_dsfield(ipv6_hdr(skb));
TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->sacked = 0;
- sk = __inet6_lookup(net, &tcp_hashinfo,
- &ipv6_hdr(skb)->saddr, th->source,
- &ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr, ntohs(th->dest),
- inet6_iif(skb));
+ if (likely((sk = sock_skb_steal(skb)) == NULL))
+ sk = __inet6_lookup(net, &tcp_hashinfo,
+ &ipv6_hdr(skb)->saddr, th->source,
+ &ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr, ntohs(th->dest),
+ inet6_iif(skb));
if (!sk)
goto no_tcp_socket;
diff --git a/net/ipv6/udp.c b/net/ipv6/udp.c
index a6aecf7..e2741aa 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/udp.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/udp.c
@@ -488,8 +488,9 @@ int __udp6_lib_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct hlist_head udptable[],
* check socket cache ... must talk to Alan about his plans
* for sock caches... i'll skip this for now.
*/
- sk = __udp6_lib_lookup(net, saddr, uh->source,
- daddr, uh->dest, inet6_iif(skb), udptable);
+ if (likely((sk = sock_skb_steal(skb)) == NULL))
+ sk = __udp6_lib_lookup(net, saddr, uh->source,
+ daddr, uh->dest, inet6_iif(skb), udptable);
if (sk == NULL) {
if (!xfrm6_policy_check(NULL, XFRM_POLICY_IN, skb))
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-02 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-01 14:24 [net-next PATCH 00/16] Transparent proxying patches, take six KOVACS Krisztian
2008-10-01 14:24 ` [net-next PATCH 07/16] Make Netfilter's ip_route_me_harder() non-local address compatible KOVACS Krisztian
2008-10-01 14:45 ` David Miller
2008-10-01 14:24 ` [net-next PATCH 06/16] Handle TCP SYN+ACK/ACK/RST transparency KOVACS Krisztian
2008-10-01 14:42 ` David Miller
2008-10-01 14:46 ` KOVACS Krisztian
2008-10-01 14:24 ` [net-next PATCH 13/16] iptables tproxy core KOVACS Krisztian
2008-10-02 9:19 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-01 14:24 ` [net-next PATCH 03/16] Allow binding to non-local addresses if IP_TRANSPARENT is set KOVACS Krisztian
2008-10-01 14:31 ` David Miller
2008-10-01 14:24 ` [net-next PATCH 14/16] iptables socket match KOVACS Krisztian
2008-10-02 9:26 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-02 10:26 ` KOVACS Krisztian
2008-10-02 10:35 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-03 14:04 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-10-01 14:24 ` [net-next PATCH 09/16] Export UDP socket lookup function KOVACS Krisztian
2008-10-01 14:48 ` David Miller
2008-10-01 14:24 ` [net-next PATCH 12/16] Split Netfilter IPv4 defragmentation into a separate module KOVACS Krisztian
2008-10-02 9:18 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-01 14:24 ` [net-next PATCH 16/16] Add documentation KOVACS Krisztian
2008-10-01 16:22 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-10-02 9:37 ` [RESEND net-next " KOVACS Krisztian
2008-10-02 9:38 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-03 14:01 ` [net-next " Jan Engelhardt
2008-10-07 7:01 ` KOVACS Krisztian
2008-10-07 19:50 ` David Miller
2008-10-07 20:02 ` KOVACS Krisztian
2008-10-07 20:47 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-07 20:53 ` David Miller
2008-10-08 0:32 ` Philip Craig
2008-10-01 14:24 ` [net-next PATCH 08/16] Port redirection support for TCP KOVACS Krisztian
2008-10-01 14:47 ` David Miller
2008-10-01 14:24 ` [net-next PATCH 11/16] Don't lookup the socket if there's a socket attached to the skb KOVACS Krisztian
2008-10-01 14:24 ` [net-next PATCH 02/16] Implement IP_TRANSPARENT socket option KOVACS Krisztian
2008-10-01 14:30 ` David Miller
2008-10-01 14:24 ` [net-next PATCH 15/16] iptables TPROXY target KOVACS Krisztian
2008-10-02 9:28 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-01 14:24 ` [net-next PATCH 05/16] Conditionally enable transparent flow flag when connecting KOVACS Krisztian
2008-10-01 14:36 ` David Miller
2008-10-01 14:24 ` [net-next PATCH 01/16] Loosen source address check on IPv4 output KOVACS Krisztian
2008-10-01 14:28 ` David Miller
2008-10-01 14:24 ` [net-next PATCH 04/16] Make inet_sock.h independent of route.h KOVACS Krisztian
2008-10-01 14:34 ` David Miller
2008-10-01 14:24 ` [net-next PATCH 10/16] Don't lookup the socket if there's a socket attached to the skb KOVACS Krisztian
2008-10-01 14:50 ` David Miller
2008-10-01 15:38 ` KOVACS Krisztian
2008-10-01 15:51 ` David Miller
2008-10-02 15:43 ` KOVACS Krisztian [this message]
2008-10-02 17:09 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2008-10-02 19:58 ` David Miller
2008-10-03 8:57 ` KOVACS Krisztian
2008-10-03 13:47 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2008-10-07 7:36 ` KOVACS Krisztian
2008-10-07 12:36 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2008-10-07 18:42 ` David Miller
2008-10-07 7:42 ` [net-next PATCH] Add udplib_lookup_skb() helpers (was: [net-next PATCH 10/16] Don't lookup the socket if there's a socket attached to the skb) KOVACS Krisztian
2008-10-07 12:34 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2008-10-07 19:39 ` [net-next PATCH] Add udplib_lookup_skb() helpers David Miller
2008-10-07 7:59 ` [net-next PATCH] Don't lookup the socket if there's a socket attached to the skb (was: Re: [net-next PATCH 10/16] Don't lookup the socket if there's a socket attached to the skb) KOVACS Krisztian
2008-10-07 12:36 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2008-10-07 19:41 ` [net-next PATCH] Don't lookup the socket if there's a socket attached to the skb David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1222962200.14079.19.camel@este \
--to=hidden@sch.bme.hu \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).