From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Schermerhorn Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/32] Swap over NFS - v19 Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:59:09 -0400 Message-ID: <1222981149.6129.136.camel@lts-notebook> References: <20081002130504.927878499@chello.nl> <20081002124748.638c95ff.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, Daniel Lezcano , Pekka Enberg , Neil Brown , David Miller To: Andrew Morton Return-path: Received: from g1t0028.austin.hp.com ([15.216.28.35]:14341 "EHLO g1t0028.austin.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754104AbYJBU7N (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Oct 2008 16:59:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20081002124748.638c95ff.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 12:47 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:05:04 +0200 Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > Let's get this ball rolling... > > I don't think we're really able to get any MM balls rolling until we > get all the split-LRU stuff landed. Is anyone testing it? Is it good? Andrew: Up until the mailing list traffic and patches slowed down, I was testing it continuously with a heavy stress load that would bring the system to its knees before the splitlru and unevictable changes. When it would run for days without error [96 hours was my max run] and no further patches came, I've concentrated on other things. Rik and Kosaki-san have run some performance oriented tests, reported here a while back. Maybe they have more info. Lee