* decnet: Fix complier warning
@ 2008-10-15 12:19 Steven Whitehouse
2008-10-15 12:37 ` Ben Hutchings
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Steven Whitehouse @ 2008-10-15 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem; +Cc: netdev, Christine Caulfield
This patch fixes a warning seen during compiling dn_dev.c. The warning is harmless
since we know that the structure length in question is less than 2^32 bytes, but
this fixes it anyway.
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Cc: Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie@redhat.com>
diff --git a/net/decnet/dn_dev.c b/net/decnet/dn_dev.c
index 2f0ac3c..d9bc69c 100644
--- a/net/decnet/dn_dev.c
+++ b/net/decnet/dn_dev.c
@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ static struct dn_dev_parms dn_dev_list[] = {
#define DN_DEV_LIST_SIZE ARRAY_SIZE(dn_dev_list)
-#define DN_DEV_PARMS_OFFSET(x) ((int) ((char *) &((struct dn_dev_parms *)0)->x))
+#define DN_DEV_PARMS_OFFSET(x) ((long) ((char *) &((struct dn_dev_parms *)0)->x))
#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: decnet: Fix complier warning
2008-10-15 12:19 decnet: Fix complier warning Steven Whitehouse
@ 2008-10-15 12:37 ` Ben Hutchings
2008-10-15 12:40 ` Steven Whitehouse
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ben Hutchings @ 2008-10-15 12:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven Whitehouse; +Cc: davem, netdev, Christine Caulfield
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 13:19 +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> This patch fixes a warning seen during compiling dn_dev.c. The warning is harmless
> since we know that the structure length in question is less than 2^32 bytes, but
> this fixes it anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
> Cc: Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie@redhat.com>
>
> diff --git a/net/decnet/dn_dev.c b/net/decnet/dn_dev.c
> index 2f0ac3c..d9bc69c 100644
> --- a/net/decnet/dn_dev.c
> +++ b/net/decnet/dn_dev.c
> @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ static struct dn_dev_parms dn_dev_list[] = {
>
> #define DN_DEV_LIST_SIZE ARRAY_SIZE(dn_dev_list)
>
> -#define DN_DEV_PARMS_OFFSET(x) ((int) ((char *) &((struct dn_dev_parms *)0)->x))
> +#define DN_DEV_PARMS_OFFSET(x) ((long) ((char *) &((struct dn_dev_parms *)0)->x))
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
>
Or you could make this use offsetof(). Daring, I know, it's only been a
standard macro for nearly 20 years.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: decnet: Fix complier warning
2008-10-15 12:37 ` Ben Hutchings
@ 2008-10-15 12:40 ` Steven Whitehouse
2008-10-15 22:57 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Steven Whitehouse @ 2008-10-15 12:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ben Hutchings; +Cc: davem, netdev, Christine Caulfield
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 13:37 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 13:19 +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> > This patch fixes a warning seen during compiling dn_dev.c. The warning is harmless
> > since we know that the structure length in question is less than 2^32 bytes, but
> > this fixes it anyway.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie@redhat.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/net/decnet/dn_dev.c b/net/decnet/dn_dev.c
> > index 2f0ac3c..d9bc69c 100644
> > --- a/net/decnet/dn_dev.c
> > +++ b/net/decnet/dn_dev.c
> > @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ static struct dn_dev_parms dn_dev_list[] = {
> >
> > #define DN_DEV_LIST_SIZE ARRAY_SIZE(dn_dev_list)
> >
> > -#define DN_DEV_PARMS_OFFSET(x) ((int) ((char *) &((struct dn_dev_parms *)0)->x))
> > +#define DN_DEV_PARMS_OFFSET(x) ((long) ((char *) &((struct dn_dev_parms *)0)->x))
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
> >
>
> Or you could make this use offsetof(). Daring, I know, it's only been a
> standard macro for nearly 20 years.
>
> Ben.
>
Yes, thats true. The whole set of code is rather suspect to say the
least and I was going for the minimal fix. Its a long time since I last
looked at this code so I don't remember exactly why it was done in that
way,
Steve.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: decnet: Fix complier warning
2008-10-15 12:40 ` Steven Whitehouse
@ 2008-10-15 22:57 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2008-10-15 22:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: swhiteho; +Cc: bhutchings, netdev, ccaulfie
From: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:40:35 +0100
> On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 13:37 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Or you could make this use offsetof(). Daring, I know, it's only been a
> > standard macro for nearly 20 years.
>
> Yes, thats true. The whole set of code is rather suspect to say the
> least and I was going for the minimal fix. Its a long time since I last
> looked at this code so I don't remember exactly why it was done in that
> way,
I'm going to check in something like the following:
diff --git a/net/decnet/dn_dev.c b/net/decnet/dn_dev.c
index 2f0ac3c..ba35258 100644
--- a/net/decnet/dn_dev.c
+++ b/net/decnet/dn_dev.c
@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ static struct dn_dev_parms dn_dev_list[] = {
#define DN_DEV_LIST_SIZE ARRAY_SIZE(dn_dev_list)
-#define DN_DEV_PARMS_OFFSET(x) ((int) ((char *) &((struct dn_dev_parms *)0)->x))
+#define DN_DEV_PARMS_OFFSET(x) offsetof(struct dn_dev_parms, x)
#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-10-15 22:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-10-15 12:19 decnet: Fix complier warning Steven Whitehouse
2008-10-15 12:37 ` Ben Hutchings
2008-10-15 12:40 ` Steven Whitehouse
2008-10-15 22:57 ` David Miller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).