From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: nf-next-2.6.git Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 09:33:58 -0700 Message-ID: <1225211639.5269.148.camel@localhost> References: <49070504.1010005@trash.net> <1225211021.5269.146.camel@localhost> <49073E96.9000703@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Netfilter Development Mailinglist , Linux Netdev List To: Patrick McHardy Return-path: In-Reply-To: <49073E96.9000703@trash.net> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 17:32 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote: > Joe Perches wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 13:26 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote: > >> Since Dave has created his net-next-2.6.git tree, I'm now also > >> taking netfilter patches for 2.6.29. The nf-next-2.6.git tree > >> is located at: > >> > >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kaber/nf-next-2.6.git > > > > Should either or both of git trees be added to > > MAINTAINERS: NETFILTER/IPTABLES/IPCHAINS? > > > > T: git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kaber/nft-2.6.git > > T: git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kaber/nf-next-2.6.git > > The first one is a development tree for something not inside > the kernel yet. Adding the second one would be fine. I believe you got the order reversed. This below could/should be added yes? T: git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kaber/nft-2.6.git