From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: oh crap... (re: %p6) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:16:54 -0700 Message-ID: <1225304214.5269.339.camel@localhost> References: <20081029.015402.234525839.davem@davemloft.net> <1225292124.20276.12.camel@brick> <1225294760.5269.301.camel@localhost> <1225301082.5688.24.camel@brick> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Harvey Harrison Return-path: Received: from 136-022.dsl.LABridge.com ([206.117.136.22]:4489 "EHLO mail.perches.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754025AbYJ2SQ7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:16:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1225301082.5688.24.camel@brick> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 10:24 -0700, Harvey Harrison wrote: > Putting a modifier after the format specifier seems a little strange to me. Harvey, please remember the whole %p concept is based on modifier after format specifier. I think %p6 followed by combinations of things: "::" compressed v6, largest block of consecutive 0's replaced with :: "-:" no separating colons, use space instead "-0" no leading 0's ".4" last word as ipv4 dotted decimal "x1" u8 form "x2" be16 "x4" be32 "x8" be64 So that you could have: %p6:: 1234:000a::c0a8:0101 %p6::-0 1234:a::c0a8:0101 %p6::-0.4 1234:a::192.168.1.1 %p6-0-:x1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a b c d e f %p6x1 00:01:02:03:04:05:06:07:09:0a:0b:0c:0d:0e:0f etc. If acceptable, I'll submit a patch.