From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick Ohly Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 11/13] time sync: generic infrastructure to map between time stamps generated by a clock source and system time Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:14:30 +0100 Message-ID: <1226506470.31699.81.camel@ecld0pohly> References: <1226415447.31699.10.camel@ecld0pohly> <4919B03E.1050504@linux.intel.com> <1226476898.31699.37.camel@ecld0pohly> <20081112.020834.114661119.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:62048 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754361AbYKLQOd (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:14:33 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20081112.020834.114661119.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 10:08 +0000, David Miller wrote: > From: Patrick Ohly > Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:01:38 +0100 > > > Anyway, I'll try to keep this in mind, but would prefer to not reformat > > the patches unless I have to touch them for other reasons. > > That distracts the eyes of the people reviewing the code, because > such people spend most of their time reading code that conforms > to the proper kernel coding style. You are right of course. I have changed this and also addressed the other comments. I'll give it a few more days in case that there are further comments, then resubmit with linux-kernel on CC. Should I rebase against net-2.6 or net-next-2.6? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.