From: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 05/11] ip: support for TX timestamps on UDP and RAW sockets
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:08:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1227096528-24150-6-git-send-email-patrick.ohly@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1227096528-24150-5-git-send-email-patrick.ohly@intel.com>
Instructions for time stamping outgoing packets are take from the
socket layer and later copied into the new skb.
---
include/net/ip.h | 1 +
net/can/raw.c | 6 ++++++
net/ipv4/icmp.c | 2 ++
net/ipv4/ip_output.c | 2 ++
net/ipv4/raw.c | 1 +
net/ipv4/udp.c | 4 ++++
6 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/ip.h b/include/net/ip.h
index bc026ec..9bc2b65 100644
--- a/include/net/ip.h
+++ b/include/net/ip.h
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ struct ipcm_cookie
__be32 addr;
int oif;
struct ip_options *opt;
+ union sk_buff_hwtstamp tstamp_tx;
};
#define IPCB(skb) ((struct inet_skb_parm*)((skb)->cb))
diff --git a/net/can/raw.c b/net/can/raw.c
index 6e0663f..d4a38e3 100644
--- a/net/can/raw.c
+++ b/net/can/raw.c
@@ -618,6 +618,7 @@ static int raw_sendmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock,
struct raw_sock *ro = raw_sk(sk);
struct sk_buff *skb;
struct net_device *dev;
+ union sk_buff_hwtstamp tstamp_tx;
int ifindex;
int err;
@@ -639,6 +640,10 @@ static int raw_sendmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock,
if (!dev)
return -ENXIO;
+ err = sock_tx_timestamp(msg, sk, &tstamp_tx);
+ if (err < 0)
+ return err;
+
skb = sock_alloc_send_skb(sk, size, msg->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT,
&err);
if (!skb) {
@@ -654,6 +659,7 @@ static int raw_sendmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock,
}
skb->dev = dev;
skb->sk = sk;
+ skb->hwtstamp = tstamp_tx;
err = can_send(skb, ro->loopback);
diff --git a/net/ipv4/icmp.c b/net/ipv4/icmp.c
index 21e497e..ba739f4 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/icmp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/icmp.c
@@ -375,6 +375,7 @@ static void icmp_reply(struct icmp_bxm *icmp_param, struct sk_buff *skb)
inet->tos = ip_hdr(skb)->tos;
daddr = ipc.addr = rt->rt_src;
ipc.opt = NULL;
+ ipc.tstamp_tx.hwtstamp.tv64 = 0;
if (icmp_param->replyopts.optlen) {
ipc.opt = &icmp_param->replyopts;
if (ipc.opt->srr)
@@ -532,6 +533,7 @@ void icmp_send(struct sk_buff *skb_in, int type, int code, __be32 info)
inet_sk(sk)->tos = tos;
ipc.addr = iph->saddr;
ipc.opt = &icmp_param.replyopts;
+ ipc.tstamp_tx.hwtstamp.tv64 = 0;
{
struct flowi fl = {
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
index 46d7be2..1498848 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
@@ -940,6 +940,7 @@ alloc_new_skb:
skb->ip_summed = csummode;
skb->csum = 0;
skb_reserve(skb, hh_len);
+ skb->hwtstamp = ipc->tstamp_tx;
/*
* Find where to start putting bytes.
@@ -1354,6 +1355,7 @@ void ip_send_reply(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_reply_arg *ar
daddr = ipc.addr = rt->rt_src;
ipc.opt = NULL;
+ ipc.tstamp_tx.hwtstamp.tv64 = 0;
if (replyopts.opt.optlen) {
ipc.opt = &replyopts.opt;
diff --git a/net/ipv4/raw.c b/net/ipv4/raw.c
index 998fcff..9115ed5 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/raw.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/raw.c
@@ -493,6 +493,7 @@ static int raw_sendmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
ipc.addr = inet->saddr;
ipc.opt = NULL;
+ ipc.tstamp_tx.hwtstamp.tv64 = 0;
ipc.oif = sk->sk_bound_dev_if;
if (msg->msg_controllen) {
diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
index fea2d87..32c4e98 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
@@ -573,6 +573,7 @@ int udp_sendmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
ipc.opt = NULL;
+ ipc.tstamp_tx.hwtstamp.tv64 = 0;
if (up->pending) {
/*
@@ -620,6 +621,9 @@ int udp_sendmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
ipc.addr = inet->saddr;
ipc.oif = sk->sk_bound_dev_if;
+ err = sock_tx_timestamp(msg, sk, &ipc.tstamp_tx);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
if (msg->msg_controllen) {
err = ip_cmsg_send(sock_net(sk), msg, &ipc);
if (err)
--
1.6.0.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-19 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-19 12:08 hardware time stamping with extra skb->hwtstamp Patrick Ohly
2008-11-19 12:08 ` [RFC PATCH 01/11] put_cmsg_compat + SO_TIMESTAMP[NS]: use same name for value as caller Patrick Ohly
2008-11-19 12:08 ` [RFC PATCH 02/11] net: new user space API for time stamping of incoming and outgoing packets Patrick Ohly
2008-11-19 12:08 ` [RFC PATCH 03/11] net: infrastructure for hardware time stamping Patrick Ohly
2008-11-19 12:08 ` [RFC PATCH 04/11] net: socket infrastructure for SO_TIMESTAMPING Patrick Ohly
2008-11-19 12:08 ` Patrick Ohly [this message]
2008-11-19 12:08 ` [RFC PATCH 06/11] net: pass new SIOCSHWTSTAMP through to device drivers Patrick Ohly
2008-11-19 12:08 ` [RFC PATCH 07/11] igb: stub support for SIOCSHWTSTAMP Patrick Ohly
2008-11-19 12:08 ` [RFC PATCH 08/11] clocksource: allow usage independent of timekeeping.c Patrick Ohly
2008-11-19 12:08 ` [RFC PATCH 09/11] igb: infrastructure for hardware time stamping Patrick Ohly
2008-11-19 12:08 ` [RFC PATCH 10/11] time sync: generic infrastructure to map between time stamps generated by a clock source and system time Patrick Ohly
2008-11-19 12:08 ` [RFC PATCH 11/11] igb: use clocksync to implement hardware time stamping Patrick Ohly
2008-11-20 1:14 ` [RFC PATCH 10/11] time sync: generic infrastructure to map between time stamps generated by a clock source and system time Andrew Morton
2008-11-20 7:08 ` Ohly, Patrick
2008-12-05 21:05 ` [RFC PATCH 08/11] clocksource: allow usage independent of timekeeping.c john stultz
2008-12-11 12:11 ` Patrick Ohly
2008-12-11 22:23 ` john stultz
2008-12-12 8:50 ` Patrick Ohly
2008-11-19 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH 03/11] net: infrastructure for hardware time stamping Patrick Ohly
2008-11-27 6:14 ` hardware time stamping with extra skb->hwtstamp Oliver Hartkopp
2008-11-27 10:07 ` Patrick Ohly
2008-11-27 14:02 ` Octavian Purdila
2008-11-27 15:31 ` Patrick Ohly
2008-11-27 18:53 ` Octavian Purdila
2008-11-27 22:13 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2008-11-28 12:55 ` Octavian Purdila
2008-11-28 15:38 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2008-11-28 16:00 ` Octavian Purdila
2008-12-01 10:37 ` Patrick Ohly
2008-12-01 16:31 ` Patrick Ohly
2008-12-01 16:45 ` Oliver Hartkopp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1227096528-24150-6-git-send-email-patrick.ohly@intel.com \
--to=patrick.ohly@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).