From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick Ohly Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 03/11] net: infrastructure for hardware time stamping Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:21:03 +0100 Message-ID: <1227108063.16263.107.camel@ecld0pohly> References: <1227096528-24150-1-git-send-email-patrick.ohly@intel.com> <1227096528-24150-2-git-send-email-patrick.ohly@intel.com> <1227096528-24150-3-git-send-email-patrick.ohly@intel.com> <1227096528-24150-4-git-send-email-patrick.ohly@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , David Miller To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:24288 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753630AbYKSPVM (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:21:12 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1227096528-24150-4-git-send-email-patrick.ohly@intel.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 12:08 +0000, Ohly, Patrick wrote: > + struct sock_exterr_skb *serr; [...] > + memset(serr, 0, sizeof(serr)); Before someone else mentions it: this was meant to be "sizeof(*serr)" of course. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.