From: Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] xfrm: Accept XFRM_STATE_AF_UNSPEC SAs on IPv4/IPv6 only hosts
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 10:49:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1228211364.23126.62.camel@martin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1227629406.21037.193.camel@martin>
I'm wondering what's the state of this patch. Should I resubmit without
[RFC]? Something else wrong with it?
It has been tagged as "Accepted" in patchworks, but isn't gone anywhere
so far.
Thanks
Martin
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 17:10 +0100, Martin Willi wrote:
> Installing SAs using the XFRM_STATE_AF_UNSPEC fails on hosts with
> support for one address family only. This patch accepts such SAs, even
> if the processing of not supported packets will fail.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org>
>
> ---
> For me the meaning of that flag is not really clear. If it means
> "I-want-to-run-v6-in-v4-or-vice-versa" then the current behavior
> (reject SA) is probably ok.
> However, in my understanding ("accept-any-inner-address-family"), the
> kernel should accept such SAs. Otherwise userspace has to query the
> supported address families.
>
> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
> index 508337f..456782b 100644
> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
> @@ -2032,8 +2032,9 @@ int xfrm_init_state(struct xfrm_state *x)
> x->inner_mode = inner_mode;
> } else {
> struct xfrm_mode *inner_mode_iaf;
> + int iafamily = AF_INET;
>
> - inner_mode = xfrm_get_mode(x->props.mode, AF_INET);
> + inner_mode = xfrm_get_mode(x->props.mode, x->props.family);
> if (inner_mode == NULL)
> goto error;
>
> @@ -2041,22 +2042,17 @@ int xfrm_init_state(struct xfrm_state *x)
> xfrm_put_mode(inner_mode);
> goto error;
> }
> + x->inner_mode = inner_mode;
>
> - inner_mode_iaf = xfrm_get_mode(x->props.mode, AF_INET6);
> - if (inner_mode_iaf == NULL)
> - goto error;
> + if (x->props.family == AF_INET)
> + iafamily = AF_INET6;
>
> - if (!(inner_mode_iaf->flags & XFRM_MODE_FLAG_TUNNEL)) {
> - xfrm_put_mode(inner_mode_iaf);
> - goto error;
> - }
> -
> - if (x->props.family == AF_INET) {
> - x->inner_mode = inner_mode;
> - x->inner_mode_iaf = inner_mode_iaf;
> - } else {
> - x->inner_mode = inner_mode_iaf;
> - x->inner_mode_iaf = inner_mode;
> + inner_mode_iaf = xfrm_get_mode(x->props.mode, iafamily);
> + if (inner_mode_iaf) {
> + if (inner_mode_iaf->flags & XFRM_MODE_FLAG_TUNNEL)
> + x->inner_mode_iaf = inner_mode_iaf;
> + else
> + xfrm_put_mode(inner_mode_iaf);
> }
> }
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-02 9:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-25 16:10 [RFC PATCH] xfrm: Accept XFRM_STATE_AF_UNSPEC SAs on IPv4/IPv6 only hosts Martin Willi
2008-12-02 9:49 ` Martin Willi [this message]
2008-12-02 23:07 ` David Miller
2008-12-03 23:38 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1228211364.23126.62.camel@martin \
--to=martin@strongswan.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox