From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Hutchings Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] ethtool: Add GGRO and SGRO ops Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 20:11:17 +0000 Message-ID: <1229112677.3051.9.camel@achroite> References: <20081212053116.GA2927@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "David S. Miller" , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Herbert Xu Return-path: Received: from smarthost01.mail.zen.net.uk ([212.23.3.140]:36107 "EHLO smarthost01.mail.zen.net.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752123AbYLLULX (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:11:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 16:31 +1100, Herbert Xu wrote: > ethtool: Add GGRO and SGRO ops > > This patch adds the ethtool ops to enable and disable GRO. It also > makes GRO depend on RX checksum offload much the same as how TSO > depends on SG support. [...] Why don't you add NETIF_F_GRO to the flags handled by get_flags() and set_flags()? Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job. They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.