From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Eilon Greenstein" Subject: Re: bnx2x machine check in bnx2x_ack_int() Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:36:34 +0200 Message-ID: <1229369794.26330.2.camel@lb-tlvb-eliezer> References: <200812091204.35296.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> <200812150921.08668.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> <1229361480.22295.22.camel@lb-tlvb-eliezer> <200812151104.00724.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" To: "Bjorn Helgaas" Return-path: Received: from mms1.broadcom.com ([216.31.210.17]:1792 "EHLO mms1.broadcom.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751971AbYLOTi1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:38:27 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200812151104.00724.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 10:04 -0800, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > Yep, it's definitely possible that this is HW related. The proto > has 57710, but the product will ultimately use the 57711, so I don't > really even care about testing the 57710. > > After upgrading some pieces on my boards, I can't reproduce the > MCA either. So I guess we can just write it off for now. The only > reason I pointed out the issue at all is because it really hampered > testing of standard distro bits on the rest of the box. Please let me know if you see this issue again - we can try to root-cause it. And again, sorry for the late initial response. Eilon