From: "Eilon Greenstein" <eilong@broadcom.com>
To: "David Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 02/34]bnx2x: Barriers for the compiler
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:42:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1231951364.11301.123.camel@lb-tlvb-eliezer> (raw)
To make sure no swapping are made by the compiler, changed HAS_WORK to inline
functions and added all the necessary barriers
Signed-off-by: Eilon Greenstein <eilong@broadcom.com>
---
drivers/net/bnx2x.h | 9 +--------
drivers/net/bnx2x_main.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bnx2x.h b/drivers/net/bnx2x.h
index 96a8889..e5346d8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bnx2x.h
+++ b/drivers/net/bnx2x.h
@@ -268,14 +268,7 @@ struct bnx2x_fastpath {
#define bnx2x_fp(bp, nr, var) (bp->fp[nr].var)
-#define BNX2X_HAS_TX_WORK(fp) \
- ((fp->tx_pkt_prod != le16_to_cpu(*fp->tx_cons_sb)) || \
- (fp->tx_pkt_prod != fp->tx_pkt_cons))
-
-#define BNX2X_HAS_RX_WORK(fp) \
- (fp->rx_comp_cons != rx_cons_sb)
-
-#define BNX2X_HAS_WORK(fp) (BNX2X_HAS_RX_WORK(fp) || BNX2X_HAS_TX_WORK(fp))
+#define BNX2X_HAS_WORK(fp) (bnx2x_has_rx_work(fp) || bnx2x_has_tx_work(fp))
/* MC hsi */
diff --git a/drivers/net/bnx2x_main.c b/drivers/net/bnx2x_main.c
index cc6ffba..b8bc1a5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bnx2x_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bnx2x_main.c
@@ -735,6 +735,17 @@ static u16 bnx2x_ack_int(struct bnx2x *bp)
* fast path service functions
*/
+static inline int bnx2x_has_tx_work(struct bnx2x_fastpath *fp)
+{
+ u16 tx_cons_sb;
+
+ /* Tell compiler that status block fields can change */
+ barrier();
+ tx_cons_sb = le16_to_cpu(*fp->tx_cons_sb);
+ return ((fp->tx_pkt_prod != tx_cons_sb) ||
+ (fp->tx_pkt_prod != fp->tx_pkt_cons));
+}
+
/* free skb in the packet ring at pos idx
* return idx of last bd freed
*/
@@ -6665,7 +6676,7 @@ static int bnx2x_nic_unload(struct bnx2x *bp, int unload_mode)
cnt = 1000;
smp_rmb();
- while (BNX2X_HAS_TX_WORK(fp)) {
+ while (bnx2x_has_tx_work(fp)) {
bnx2x_tx_int(fp, 1000);
if (!cnt) {
@@ -9245,6 +9256,18 @@ static int bnx2x_set_power_state(struct bnx2x *bp, pci_power_t state)
return 0;
}
+static inline int bnx2x_has_rx_work(struct bnx2x_fastpath *fp)
+{
+ u16 rx_cons_sb;
+
+ /* Tell compiler that status block fields can change */
+ barrier();
+ rx_cons_sb = le16_to_cpu(*fp->rx_cons_sb);
+ if ((rx_cons_sb & MAX_RCQ_DESC_CNT) == MAX_RCQ_DESC_CNT)
+ rx_cons_sb++;
+ return (fp->rx_comp_cons != rx_cons_sb);
+}
+
/*
* net_device service functions
*/
@@ -9255,7 +9278,6 @@ static int bnx2x_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
napi);
struct bnx2x *bp = fp->bp;
int work_done = 0;
- u16 rx_cons_sb;
#ifdef BNX2X_STOP_ON_ERROR
if (unlikely(bp->panic))
@@ -9268,19 +9290,12 @@ static int bnx2x_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
bnx2x_update_fpsb_idx(fp);
- if (BNX2X_HAS_TX_WORK(fp))
+ if (bnx2x_has_tx_work(fp))
bnx2x_tx_int(fp, budget);
- rx_cons_sb = le16_to_cpu(*fp->rx_cons_sb);
- if ((rx_cons_sb & MAX_RCQ_DESC_CNT) == MAX_RCQ_DESC_CNT)
- rx_cons_sb++;
- if (BNX2X_HAS_RX_WORK(fp))
+ if (bnx2x_has_rx_work(fp))
work_done = bnx2x_rx_int(fp, budget);
-
rmb(); /* BNX2X_HAS_WORK() reads the status block */
- rx_cons_sb = le16_to_cpu(*fp->rx_cons_sb);
- if ((rx_cons_sb & MAX_RCQ_DESC_CNT) == MAX_RCQ_DESC_CNT)
- rx_cons_sb++;
/* must not complete if we consumed full budget */
if ((work_done < budget) && !BNX2X_HAS_WORK(fp)) {
--
1.5.4.3
next reply other threads:[~2009-01-14 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-14 16:42 Eilon Greenstein [this message]
2009-01-14 21:13 ` [PATCH 02/34]bnx2x: Barriers for the compiler David Miller
2009-01-15 9:50 ` Eilon Greenstein
2009-01-18 7:25 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1231951364.11301.123.camel@lb-tlvb-eliezer \
--to=eilong@broadcom.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox