From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Harvey Harrison Subject: Re: sfc: Replace LRO with GRO Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:12:47 -0800 Message-ID: <1232403167.5539.1.camel@brick> References: <20090115042422.GB29658@gondor.apana.org.au> <20090118.215027.46669769.davem@davemloft.net> <1232376006.3004.19.camel@achroite> <20090119.132929.108799868.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: bhutchings@solarflare.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Rothwell To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.169]:32582 "EHLO wf-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753853AbZASWMt (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:12:49 -0500 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 27so3421403wfd.4 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:12:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20090119.132929.108799868.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 13:29 -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Ben Hutchings > > > > Please could you push this and other GRO changes for .30 to > > net-next-2.6? > > All of Herbert's bug fixes are going into net-2.6, and that's > where they will stay. > > I haven't published my net-next-2.6 tree at all, because > Stephen Rothwell hasn't stated that such content is > OK yet for his -next tree. I thought Stephen had stated that anytime _after_ -rc1 was released was OK for new material destined for the next release. If you're waiting for an explicit OK, I don't think it will forthcoming. Harvey