From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au,
matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com, chinang.ma@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sharad.c.tripathi@intel.com,
arjan@linux.intel.com, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com,
harita.chilukuri@intel.com, douglas.w.styner@intel.com,
peter.xihong.wang@intel.com, hubert.nueckel@intel.com,
chris.mason@oracle.com, srostedt@redhat.com,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com,
anirban.chakraborty@qlogic.com
Subject: Re: Mainline kernel OLTP performance update
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:47:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1232617672.14549.25.camel@penberg-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1232616517.11429.129.camel@ymzhang>
On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 17:28 +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 11:15 +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 16:36 +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 18:58 -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 20 Jan 2009, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > kmem_cache skbuff_head_cache's object size is just 256, so it shares the kmem_cache
> > > > > with :0000256. Their order is 1 which means every slab consists of 2 physical pages.
> > > >
> > > > That order can be changed. Try specifying slub_max_order=0 on the kernel
> > > > command line to force an order 0 alloc.
> > > I tried slub_max_order=0 and there is no improvement on this UDP-U-4k issue.
> > > Both get_page_from_freelist and __free_pages_ok's cpu time are still very high.
> > >
> > > I checked my instrumentation in kernel and found it's caused by large object allocation/free
> > > whose size is more than PAGE_SIZE. Here its order is 1.
> > >
> > > The right free callchain is __kfree_skb => skb_release_all => skb_release_data.
> > >
> > > So this case isn't the issue that batch of allocation/free might erase partial page
> > > functionality.
> >
> > So is this the kfree(skb->head) in skb_release_data() or the put_page()
> > calls in the same function in a loop?
> It's kfree(skb->head).
>
> >
> > If it's the former, with big enough size passed to __alloc_skb(), the
> > networking code might be taking a hit from the SLUB page allocator
> > pass-through.
Do we know what kind of size is being passed to __alloc_skb() in this
case? Maybe we want to do something like this.
Pekka
SLUB: revert page allocator pass-through
This is a revert of commit aadb4bc4a1f9108c1d0fbd121827c936c2ed4217 ("SLUB:
direct pass through of page size or higher kmalloc requests").
---
diff --git a/include/linux/slub_def.h b/include/linux/slub_def.h
index 2f5c16b..3bd3662 100644
--- a/include/linux/slub_def.h
+++ b/include/linux/slub_def.h
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ struct kmem_cache {
* We keep the general caches in an array of slab caches that are used for
* 2^x bytes of allocations.
*/
-extern struct kmem_cache kmalloc_caches[PAGE_SHIFT + 1];
+extern struct kmem_cache kmalloc_caches[KMALLOC_SHIFT_HIGH + 1];
/*
* Sorry that the following has to be that ugly but some versions of GCC
@@ -135,6 +135,9 @@ static __always_inline int kmalloc_index(size_t size)
if (!size)
return 0;
+ if (size > KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE)
+ return -1;
+
if (size <= KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE)
return KMALLOC_SHIFT_LOW;
@@ -154,10 +157,6 @@ static __always_inline int kmalloc_index(size_t size)
if (size <= 1024) return 10;
if (size <= 2 * 1024) return 11;
if (size <= 4 * 1024) return 12;
-/*
- * The following is only needed to support architectures with a larger page
- * size than 4k.
- */
if (size <= 8 * 1024) return 13;
if (size <= 16 * 1024) return 14;
if (size <= 32 * 1024) return 15;
@@ -167,6 +166,10 @@ static __always_inline int kmalloc_index(size_t size)
if (size <= 512 * 1024) return 19;
if (size <= 1024 * 1024) return 20;
if (size <= 2 * 1024 * 1024) return 21;
+ if (size <= 4 * 1024 * 1024) return 22;
+ if (size <= 8 * 1024 * 1024) return 23;
+ if (size <= 16 * 1024 * 1024) return 24;
+ if (size <= 32 * 1024 * 1024) return 25;
return -1;
/*
@@ -191,6 +194,19 @@ static __always_inline struct kmem_cache *kmalloc_slab(size_t size)
if (index == 0)
return NULL;
+ /*
+ * This function only gets expanded if __builtin_constant_p(size), so
+ * testing it here shouldn't be needed. But some versions of gcc need
+ * help.
+ */
+ if (__builtin_constant_p(size) && index < 0) {
+ /*
+ * Generate a link failure. Would be great if we could
+ * do something to stop the compile here.
+ */
+ extern void __kmalloc_size_too_large(void);
+ __kmalloc_size_too_large();
+ }
return &kmalloc_caches[index];
}
@@ -204,17 +220,9 @@ static __always_inline struct kmem_cache *kmalloc_slab(size_t size)
void *kmem_cache_alloc(struct kmem_cache *, gfp_t);
void *__kmalloc(size_t size, gfp_t flags);
-static __always_inline void *kmalloc_large(size_t size, gfp_t flags)
-{
- return (void *)__get_free_pages(flags | __GFP_COMP, get_order(size));
-}
-
static __always_inline void *kmalloc(size_t size, gfp_t flags)
{
if (__builtin_constant_p(size)) {
- if (size > PAGE_SIZE)
- return kmalloc_large(size, flags);
-
if (!(flags & SLUB_DMA)) {
struct kmem_cache *s = kmalloc_slab(size);
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 6392ae5..8fad23f 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -2475,7 +2475,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmem_cache_destroy);
* Kmalloc subsystem
*******************************************************************/
-struct kmem_cache kmalloc_caches[PAGE_SHIFT + 1] __cacheline_aligned;
+struct kmem_cache kmalloc_caches[KMALLOC_SHIFT_HIGH + 1] __cacheline_aligned;
EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmalloc_caches);
static int __init setup_slub_min_order(char *str)
@@ -2537,7 +2537,7 @@ panic:
}
#ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
-static struct kmem_cache *kmalloc_caches_dma[PAGE_SHIFT + 1];
+static struct kmem_cache *kmalloc_caches_dma[KMALLOC_SHIFT_HIGH + 1];
static void sysfs_add_func(struct work_struct *w)
{
@@ -2643,8 +2643,12 @@ static struct kmem_cache *get_slab(size_t size, gfp_t flags)
return ZERO_SIZE_PTR;
index = size_index[(size - 1) / 8];
- } else
+ } else {
+ if (size > KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE)
+ return NULL;
+
index = fls(size - 1);
+ }
#ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
if (unlikely((flags & SLUB_DMA)))
@@ -2658,9 +2662,6 @@ void *__kmalloc(size_t size, gfp_t flags)
{
struct kmem_cache *s;
- if (unlikely(size > PAGE_SIZE))
- return kmalloc_large(size, flags);
-
s = get_slab(size, flags);
if (unlikely(ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(s)))
@@ -2670,25 +2671,11 @@ void *__kmalloc(size_t size, gfp_t flags)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__kmalloc);
-static void *kmalloc_large_node(size_t size, gfp_t flags, int node)
-{
- struct page *page = alloc_pages_node(node, flags | __GFP_COMP,
- get_order(size));
-
- if (page)
- return page_address(page);
- else
- return NULL;
-}
-
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
void *__kmalloc_node(size_t size, gfp_t flags, int node)
{
struct kmem_cache *s;
- if (unlikely(size > PAGE_SIZE))
- return kmalloc_large_node(size, flags, node);
-
s = get_slab(size, flags);
if (unlikely(ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(s)))
@@ -2746,11 +2733,8 @@ void kfree(const void *x)
return;
page = virt_to_head_page(x);
- if (unlikely(!PageSlab(page))) {
- BUG_ON(!PageCompound(page));
- put_page(page);
+ if (unlikely(WARN_ON(!PageSlab(page)))) /* XXX */
return;
- }
slab_free(page->slab, page, object, _RET_IP_);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(kfree);
@@ -2985,7 +2969,7 @@ void __init kmem_cache_init(void)
caches++;
}
- for (i = KMALLOC_SHIFT_LOW; i <= PAGE_SHIFT; i++) {
+ for (i = KMALLOC_SHIFT_LOW; i <= KMALLOC_SHIFT_HIGH; i++) {
create_kmalloc_cache(&kmalloc_caches[i],
"kmalloc", 1 << i, GFP_KERNEL);
caches++;
@@ -3022,7 +3006,7 @@ void __init kmem_cache_init(void)
slab_state = UP;
/* Provide the correct kmalloc names now that the caches are up */
- for (i = KMALLOC_SHIFT_LOW; i <= PAGE_SHIFT; i++)
+ for (i = KMALLOC_SHIFT_LOW; i <= KMALLOC_SHIFT_HIGH; i++)
kmalloc_caches[i]. name =
kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "kmalloc-%d", 1 << i);
@@ -3222,9 +3206,6 @@ void *__kmalloc_track_caller(size_t size, gfp_t gfpflags, unsigned long caller)
{
struct kmem_cache *s;
- if (unlikely(size > PAGE_SIZE))
- return kmalloc_large(size, gfpflags);
-
s = get_slab(size, gfpflags);
if (unlikely(ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(s)))
@@ -3238,9 +3219,6 @@ void *__kmalloc_node_track_caller(size_t size, gfp_t gfpflags,
{
struct kmem_cache *s;
- if (unlikely(size > PAGE_SIZE))
- return kmalloc_large_node(size, gfpflags, node);
-
s = get_slab(size, gfpflags);
if (unlikely(ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(s)))
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-22 9:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <BC02C49EEB98354DBA7F5DD76F2A9E800317003CB0@azsmsx501.amr.corp.intel.com>
[not found] ` <200901161503.13730.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
[not found] ` <20090115201210.ca1a9542.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2009-01-16 6:46 ` Mainline kernel OLTP performance update Nick Piggin
2009-01-16 6:55 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-01-16 7:06 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-16 7:53 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-01-16 10:20 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-20 5:16 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-01-21 23:58 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-01-22 8:36 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-01-22 9:15 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-01-22 9:28 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-01-22 9:47 ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2009-01-23 3:02 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-01-23 6:52 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-01-23 8:06 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-01-23 8:30 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-01-23 8:40 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-01-23 9:46 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-01-23 15:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-01-23 15:31 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-01-23 15:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-01-23 16:01 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-01-24 2:55 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-01-24 7:36 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-02-12 5:22 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-02-12 5:47 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-02-12 15:25 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-02-12 16:07 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-02-12 16:03 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-01-26 17:36 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-02-01 2:52 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-01-23 8:33 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-23 9:02 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-01-23 18:40 ` care and feeding of netperf (Re: Mainline kernel OLTP performance update) Rick Jones
2009-01-23 18:51 ` Grant Grundler
2009-01-24 3:03 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-01-26 18:26 ` Rick Jones
2009-01-16 7:00 ` Mainline kernel OLTP performance update Andrew Morton
2009-01-16 7:25 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-16 8:59 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-16 18:11 ` Rick Jones
2009-01-19 7:43 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-19 22:19 ` Rick Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1232617672.14549.25.camel@penberg-laptop \
--to=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com \
--cc=anirban.chakraborty@qlogic.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chinang.ma@intel.com \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=douglas.w.styner@intel.com \
--cc=harita.chilukuri@intel.com \
--cc=hubert.nueckel@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=peter.xihong.wang@intel.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=sharad.c.tripathi@intel.com \
--cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox