From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jdb@comx.dk>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@diku.dk>
Cc: Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>,
Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@wantstofly.org>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Marvell 88E609x switch?
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 11:14:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1235988885.30736.44.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0902282004340.9845@ask.diku.dk>
On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 20:10 +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> If you will send me the current patches/code, then I'll use some time
> monday to look at the register settings to see if I can spot the problem,
> by corrolating with my device driver.
Looking through my old code I found this comment, which indicate that
you should take care of PPU (Phy Polling Unit) state... I had to support
both the 6095 and 6097 chip.
Cite code:
/*** Setup PHY's ***/
/*
Accessing the PHY devices is special. Direct access to a PHY
device requires that the PPU (Phy Polling Unit) has been
disabled. The 6097 series support indirect access through SMI
registers (GLOBAL_DEV2 registers 0x18 and 0x19).
Disabling the PPU _here_ is not necessary, as the drivers R/W
operation handles disabling the PPU or does indirect SMI access
(if supported by the chip).
Notice, that there is a catch with the 6097 SMI access, as it
requires the PPU to be enabled (or else it will returns
0xFFFF).
*/
Thus, you should make sure that the PPU is disabled during setup of the
PHYs.
Well, I don't think this will solve all your issues... I'm still looking
for the missing link...
--
Med venlig hilsen / Best regards
Jesper Brouer
ComX Networks A/S
Linux Network developer
Cand. Scient Datalog / MSc.
Author of http://adsl-optimizer.dk
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-02 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-25 1:16 Marvell 88E609x switch? Gary Thomas
2009-02-25 6:31 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-02-25 13:15 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-02-25 21:30 ` Gary Thomas
2009-02-26 15:11 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-02-26 15:47 ` Gary Thomas
2009-02-26 15:57 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-02-27 1:12 ` Gary Thomas
2009-02-27 1:19 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-02-27 12:25 ` Gary Thomas
2009-02-27 12:42 ` Gary Thomas
2009-02-27 12:53 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-02-27 13:19 ` Gary Thomas
2009-02-27 13:23 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-02-27 13:27 ` Gary Thomas
2009-02-27 14:27 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-02-27 14:36 ` Gary Thomas
2009-02-27 14:40 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-02-27 14:55 ` Gary Thomas
2009-02-27 14:57 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-02-27 15:08 ` Gary Thomas
2009-02-27 15:14 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-02-27 15:25 ` Gary Thomas
2009-02-27 15:27 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-02-27 15:29 ` Gary Thomas
2009-02-27 15:31 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-02-27 15:44 ` Gary Thomas
2009-02-27 15:52 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-02-27 21:12 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-02-27 22:28 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-03-02 10:56 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-03-02 11:05 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-03-02 15:14 ` Gary Thomas
2009-03-02 15:22 ` Gary Thomas
2009-03-02 22:05 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-03-02 22:32 ` Gary Thomas
2009-03-03 8:52 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-03-03 9:04 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-03-03 12:02 ` Gary Thomas
2009-03-03 12:03 ` Gary Thomas
2009-03-03 12:32 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-03-03 13:25 ` Gary Thomas
2009-03-03 13:30 ` Gary Thomas
2009-03-03 21:52 ` Gary Thomas
2009-03-06 15:49 ` Gary Thomas
2009-03-07 15:53 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
[not found] ` <20090310102805.GO4738@xi.wantstofly.org>
2009-03-10 11:20 ` Gary Thomas
2009-03-10 13:36 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-03-10 15:11 ` Gary Thomas
2009-03-11 15:12 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-03-11 21:28 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-03-10 9:56 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-03-10 9:43 ` Lennert Buytenhek
[not found] ` <20090310093915.GK4738@xi.wantstofly.org>
2009-03-10 11:20 ` Gary Thomas
2009-02-28 17:37 ` Gary Thomas
2009-02-28 19:10 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-02-28 19:31 ` Gary Thomas
2009-03-02 10:14 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2009-03-10 9:34 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-02-27 12:52 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-02-27 13:22 ` Gary Thomas
2009-02-27 14:25 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-02-27 15:18 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-02-27 15:26 ` Gary Thomas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1235988885.30736.44.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=jdb@comx.dk \
--cc=buytenh@wantstofly.org \
--cc=gary@mlbassoc.com \
--cc=hawk@diku.dk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).