From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael Chan" Subject: Re: [PATCH] bnx2: Use request_firmware() Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:28:51 -0700 Message-ID: <1237850931.18617.39.camel@HP1> References: <1237501747.4126.10.camel@deadeye.i.decadent.org.uk> <1237503884.16140.23.camel@HP1> <20090319232541.GA19262@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org> <20090320.155030.164080684.davem@davemloft.net> <1237844879.18617.20.camel@HP1> <20090323223238.GB29609@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "David Miller" , "ben@decadent.org.uk" , "davem@davemloft.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" To: "Bastian Blank" Return-path: Received: from mms1.broadcom.com ([216.31.210.17]:4826 "EHLO mms1.broadcom.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752457AbZCWXeN (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:34:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090323223238.GB29609@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 15:32 -0700, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 02:47:59PM -0700, Michael Chan wrote: > > I'd also like to add the version information to the > bnx2_fw_file_entry > > struct instead of embedding it in the file name. It is more > flexible > > this way as each section can have different versions and can be > updated > > separately. > > Only if the firmwares are compatible enough. Can I pull the firmwares > from a > 2.6.21 kernel and ask a .29 to use them? One argument was always that > the firmware is coupled with the code. No, this won't work. Please see new proposal to breakup firmware into multiple files.