From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Hutchings Subject: e1000e NVM mutex contention warnings Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:17:04 +0100 Message-ID: <1240147024.3384.20.camel@deadeye.i.decadent.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-3YkZoGBqScvw0QR858wl" Cc: Jeff Kirsher , 524699@bugs.debian.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Graham Return-path: Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:38905 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757498AbZDSNRs (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Apr 2009 09:17:48 -0400 Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-3YkZoGBqScvw0QR858wl Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable David, What's your plan for collecting information about NVM mutex contention and when do you intend to remove the warnings? I have to say I find this way of testing very user-unfriendly and would like to see it gone as soon as possible. Ben. --=-3YkZoGBqScvw0QR858wl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBJ6yRP79ZNCRIGYgcRAmfbAKC2BWEPxwvCF/NabrcQzAvz6N3kngCdFDzX X9j0dntDz0U5Gk/Sq1oWhdE= =vGgQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-3YkZoGBqScvw0QR858wl--