From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Smith Subject: Re: 2.6.27.18: bnx2/tg3: BUG: "scheduling while atomic" trying toifenslave a second interface to my bond Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 18:38:14 -0400 Message-ID: <1241476694.8305.234.camel@psmith-ubeta.netezza.com> References: <1239657348.8944.529.camel@psmith-ubeta.netezza.com> <1241397581.6499.658.camel@homebase.localnet> <4086.1241463817@death.nxdomain.ibm.com> <20090504.120651.32573620.davem@davemloft.net> Reply-To: paul@mad-scientist.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: fubar@us.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mta.netezza.com ([12.148.248.132]:61927 "EHLO netezza.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751491AbZEDWiS (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2009 18:38:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090504.120651.32573620.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 12:06 -0700, David Miller wrote: > Greg just posted that there will be no further 2.6.27.x -stable > releases after the one he just made. Really? That seems odd. Everything I heard for the last 7 months or so, even as late as last month, seemed to imply that 2.6.27 was going to be the next long-term supported kernel, taking over from 2.6.16, and that it would be supported for "years". Maybe Adrian is taking over 2.6.27.x maintenance from Greg? Was this posted on lkml?