From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick Ohly Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: update skb_recycle_check() for hardware timestamping changes Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 15:11:39 +0200 Message-ID: <1241615499.26936.25.camel@pohly-MOBL> References: <20090506111311.GD24429@mail.wantstofly.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "davem@davemloft.net" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" To: Lennert Buytenhek Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:4425 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756529AbZEFNLm (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2009 09:11:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090506111311.GD24429@mail.wantstofly.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 14:13 +0300, Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > Commit ac45f602ee3d1b6f326f68bc0c2591ceebf05ba4 ("net: infrastructure > for hardware time stamping") added two skb initialization actions to > __alloc_skb(), which need to be added to skb_recycle_check() as well. Good catch, thanks. For what it's worth: Signed-off-by: Patrick Ohly -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.