From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcel Holtmann Subject: Re: [GIT]: Networking Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 09:53:48 +0200 Message-ID: <1243929229.3192.40.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20090601.032500.54712490.davem@davemloft.net> <1243867942.3015.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090601.143248.258478440.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from senator.holtmann.net ([87.106.208.187]:39334 "EHLO mail.holtmann.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751327AbZFBHyL (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jun 2009 03:54:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090601.143248.258478440.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Dave, > >> Things are really winding down, and the bug fix rate is down > >> to at best a trickle. It might be time to do that final > >> release soon :-) > > > > can you give me quick update on this pull request: > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=124341070008320&w=2 > > Sorry that I overlooked this. no problem, but I was just wondering since you normally never miss anything on netdev ;) > Unfortunately, I almost entirely use patchwork to manage my > work queue. So if you're pull request doesn't attach a patch > it's possible that it'll get lost in my inbox. So I suggest > attaching a patch to your pull requests, at least for bug > fix work, just like John Linville does for wireless. > > That also let's me quickly review your work in-place in my > mailbox before I even type the git pull command, which helps > me a lot. > > Anyways, I've pulled in your tree, thanks. Will have to rewrite my git-sum script, but that should not be a problem at all. Thanks for pulling. Regards Marcel