From: Pascal Terjan <pterjan@mandriva.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: 8139cp vs 8139too, request_module ?
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:02:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1244649729.14601.1.camel@plop> (raw)
Hello,
8139cp and 8139too both handle the same id and then test revision.
If revision is wrong they tell to load the other module and return
ENODEV.
Why not doing a request_module instead of printing a message ?
next reply other threads:[~2009-06-10 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-10 16:02 Pascal Terjan [this message]
2009-06-10 17:00 ` 8139cp vs 8139too, request_module ? Ben Hutchings
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1244649729.14601.1.camel@plop \
--to=pterjan@mandriva.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).