From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pascal Terjan Subject: 8139cp vs 8139too, request_module ? Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:02:09 +0200 Message-ID: <1244649729.14601.1.camel@plop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from ryu.zarb.org ([212.85.158.22]:36452 "EHLO ryu.zarb.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751329AbZFJQCK (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:02:10 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ryu.zarb.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B9893F62E for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:02:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ryu.zarb.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ryu.zarb.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTP id IcqlJHsZpzlM for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:02:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.100.212] (office-abk.mandriva.com [84.55.162.90]) by ryu.zarb.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2887D3F62D for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:02:11 +0200 (CEST) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hello, 8139cp and 8139too both handle the same id and then test revision. If revision is wrong they tell to load the other module and return ENODEV. Why not doing a request_module instead of printing a message ?