From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
To: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC] Restricting MDIO reads
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:04:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1244736247.2785.35.camel@achroite> (raw)
Currently most drivers[1] that support the "MII" ioctls allow all users
to read MDIO registers, while MDIO writes require CAP_NET_ADMIN.
However, some MDIO registers and register bits have read-to-clear (latch
high, latch low or non-rollover) or multi-word latching semantics[2].
So reading from them may interfere with the driver or other users and
should also require CAP_NET_ADMIN.
It's not clear to me just which registers should be safe to read, and
this can vary between PHYs. I think the correct thing to do is either
to restrict all MDIO reads or to whitelist standard-defined safe
registers.
Which applications, if any, depend on performing MDIO reads as an
unprivileged user? Which registers do they expect to read?
Ben.
[1]
These generic implementations allow reads by all users:
mdio, mii, pci-skeleton, phylib
These full drivers allow reads by all users:
3c574_cs, axnet_cs, bnx2, bnx2x, cassini, emac, natsemi, pcnet_cs,
r8169, sis900, skge, sky2, sungem, tg3, tlan, tulip, xirc2ps_cs,
yellowfin
(This excludes drivers that simulate MDIO reads.)
These require CAP_NET_ADMIN for reads:
amd8111e, atl1, atl1e, atl2, igb, via-velocity
[2]
At least the following register bits are defined as having read-to-clear
or multi-word latching semantics:
c22: 1.2:1, 1.4
c28: 6.1, 6.4
c33: 12.12:7
c37: 6.1
c40: 10.15
c45: 1.1.2, 1.8.11:10, 1.33.12, 1.33.14, 1.36.15:0, 1.99.15:12, 2.1.2,
2.1.7, 2.33.7:0, 2.33.11:9, 3.1.2, 3.8.11:10, 3.33.15:0, 3.66.15:0,
3.67.15:0, 3.69.15:0, 3.70.15:0, 3.71.15:0, 3.72.15:0, 3.73.15:0, 4.1.2,
4.8.11:10, 5.1.0, 5.1.2, 5.8.11:10, 6.17.1:0, 6.24.15:0, 6.25.15:0,
6.25.16:0, 7.1.2, 7.1.4, 7.1.6, 7.33.15, 29.9.15:0, 29.10.15:0,
29.11.15:0
Any reserved bits and vendor-defined registers may also have such
semantics.
--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
next reply other threads:[~2009-06-11 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-11 16:04 Ben Hutchings [this message]
2009-06-12 4:00 ` [RFC] Restricting MDIO reads David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1244736247.2785.35.camel@achroite \
--to=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).