From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamal Subject: Re: iproute2 action/policer question Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 08:04:32 -0400 Message-ID: <1245153872.4018.14.camel@dogo.mojatatu.com> References: <20090615111927.GA12316@ff.dom.local> <1245072728.3948.14.camel@dogo.mojatatu.com> <20090615145222.GA2767@ami.dom.local> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Pawe=C5=82?= Staszewski , Linux Network Development list , Andreas Henriksson To: Jarek Poplawski Return-path: Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.92.27]:10500 "EHLO qw-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750908AbZFPMFw (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jun 2009 08:05:52 -0400 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 5so2656682qwd.37 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 05:05:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20090615145222.GA2767@ami.dom.local> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 16:52 +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > I've tried debian squeeze (testing) with: iptables v1.4.3.2, iproute2 > -ss090324, and action ipt -j MARK doesn't work. AFAIK debian lenny > (stable) uses 1.4.2. I've also tried debian rescue probably based on > lenny (with iptables 1.4.2), and it seemed it didn't work yet (I'll > re-check this). When you have something new I'd be glad for Cc. I am suprised it broke again. Lets CC the debian iproute maintainer. cheers, jamal