From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ursula Braun Subject: Re: [patch 0/2] af_iucv patches for linux-2.6.31 Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:44:54 +0200 Message-ID: <1245329094.14954.38.camel@braunu-laptop> References: <20090618075446.890351000@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090618.013410.04304670.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ursula.braun@de.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mtagate2.de.ibm.com ([195.212.17.162]:52763 "EHLO mtagate2.de.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751441AbZFRMox (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:44:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090618.013410.04304670.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 01:34 -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Ursula Braun > Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:54:46 +0200 > > > Hendrik has built 2 af_iucv patches fixing inappropriate return code handling > > for sendmsg. They are built against linux-2.6.30. We would like to see them > > included in 2.6.31 - if possible. > > These patches do not apply cleanly against Linus's current tree nor > net-next-2.6 which is what you should be subumitting patches again. > > This late in the merge window it really behooves you to do anything > other than submit patches against the previous release... it's > almost guarenteed to fail, really. Dave, sorry, I did a git pull on linux-2.6.git first, and the af_iucv patches applied cleanly on my system. Anyway, I understand that I have been too late in the merge window. I will submit the patches against net-next-2.6 again. Regards, Ursula