From: Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Oliver Hartkopp <oliver.hartkopp@volkswagen.de>
Cc: ltp-list <ltp-list@lists.sf.net>,
Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2 0/7] can: CAN network device driver interfaceand drivers
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:01:19 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1245346280.5041.30.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1242125977.5911.40.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com>
Oliver,
You have anything for us now ?
Regards--
Subrata
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 16:29 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> Hi Oliver,
>
> On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 12:46 +0200, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> > Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> > > Subrata Modak wrote:
> > >> Hi Oliver/Wolfgang,
> > >>
> > >>> Hello,
> > >>>
> > >>> here comes v2 of the patch series posted some time ago. See
> > >>>
> > >>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=123507025810612&w=4.
> > >>>
> > >>> Changes since v1:
> > > [...]
> > >> Would you also like to send a patch to update the testcases for CAN in LTP
> > >> (http://ltp.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ltp/ltp/testcases/network/can/filter-tests/) ?
> > >> These tests were originally picked up from:
> > >> http://svn.berlios.de/wsvn/socketcan/trunk/test/?rev=877&sc=1
> > >
> > > The existing tests uses the vcan (virtual CAN) driver, which is not
> > > affected by these patches. Are you thinking about tests using *real* CAN
> > > devices?
> > >
> >
> > Hi Subrata,
> >
> > indeed extending the test-cases to the real CAN drivers would urge you
> > to add a least
> > two hardware CAN-interfaces to your test system and wire them correctly
> > with the
> > appropriate termination.
> > It's like having *all* ethernet cards available in your linux box to
> > test them ;-)
> > Some of these CAN controllers are only available as an on-chip device
> > (e.g. for some PowerPC CPUs).
>
> That makes great sense, as our team uses PowerPC heavily as their test
> hardware.
>
> I would also like to have tests added to LTP even if i myself do not
> have the hardware to test it. If there´s something of significant
> importance to a group of people/community, for which tests need to
> exist, then they can make into LTP, provided you have tested them and
> Acked them, and somebody else has not complained of any build/run
> breaks.
>
> >
> > If there is some room for LTP improvements, i would tend to create some
> > more test-cases
> > for the networklayer stuff in linux/net/can using the existent virtual
> > CAN driver.
>
> Please go ahead.
>
> Regards--
> Subrata
>
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Oliver
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
> production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
> Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
> Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image
> processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
> _______________________________________________
> Ltp-list mailing list
> Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-18 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-12 9:46 [PATCH v2 0/7] can: CAN network device driver interface and drivers Subrata Modak
2009-05-12 9:58 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-05-12 10:46 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2009-05-12 10:59 ` Subrata Modak
2009-06-18 17:31 ` Subrata Modak [this message]
2011-07-10 12:18 ` Update for CAN LTP tests Oliver Hartkopp
2011-07-11 16:15 ` [LTP] " Cyril Hrubis
2011-07-11 17:32 ` CAN: major update for the Controller Area Network " Oliver Hartkopp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1245346280.5041.30.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com \
--to=subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ltp-list@lists.sf.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.hartkopp@volkswagen.de \
--cc=wg@grandegger.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).