From: "Michael Chan" <mchan@broadcom.com>
To: "David Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: "rick.jones2@hp.com" <rick.jones2@hp.com>,
"nooiwa@miraclelinux.com" <nooiwa@miraclelinux.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bnx2: Fix the behavior of ethtool when ONBOOT=no
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:48:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1245887312.12000.543.camel@nseg_linux_HP1.broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090624.164233.166634429.davem@davemloft.net>
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 16:42 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Michael Chan" <mchan@broadcom.com>
> Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:59:20 -0700
>
> > On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 09:43 -0700, Rick Jones wrote:
> >> Why? Sure, there is no IP on the link, but does that mean the link is
> >> otherwise unusable? Is ethtool only about IP status?
> >>
> >
> > Once the device is closed, we no longer keep track of the link state and
> > no longer have register access to determine the link state. So we
> > assume it is down. In reality, it may still be up if WoL is enabled or
> > management firmware is running, but the driver can no longer keep track
> > of it. If we have to assume one or the other, I think it is more
> > correct to assume it is down.
>
> This is a big problem. I misread this situation when I decided to
> apply the patch yesterday, sorry. We're going to have to revert it.
>
> Applications like NetworkManager decide which devices to bring up and
> attempt DHCP etc. on based upon the link status.
>
> So if we report link down, the interface won't even be tried even if a
> cable is plugged in.
>
> Actually I wonder, does NM bring the interface "up" before checking
> link state? Does anyone know?
>
I don't know about NetworkManager, but the old ifup script will bring up
the device, wait up to 5 seconds for link up, and then do DHCP.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-24 23:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-24 2:57 [PATCH] bnx2: Fix the behavior of ethtool when ONBOOT=no Naohiro Ooiwa
2009-06-24 3:48 ` Michael Chan
2009-06-24 4:43 ` Naohiro Ooiwa
2009-06-24 5:04 ` Michael Chan
2009-06-24 5:45 ` Naohiro Ooiwa
2009-06-24 7:08 ` David Miller
2009-06-24 7:16 ` David Miller
2009-06-24 8:39 ` Naohiro Ooiwa
2009-06-24 16:43 ` Rick Jones
2009-06-24 16:59 ` Michael Chan
2009-06-24 23:42 ` David Miller
2009-06-24 23:48 ` Michael Chan [this message]
2009-06-25 0:12 ` David Miller
2009-06-25 0:25 ` David Miller
2009-06-26 4:30 ` Naohiro Ooiwa
2009-06-29 0:49 ` Naohiro Ooiwa
2009-06-30 14:50 ` Eilon Greenstein
2009-06-30 19:46 ` David Miller
2009-07-02 4:46 ` Naohiro Ooiwa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1245887312.12000.543.camel@nseg_linux_HP1.broadcom.com \
--to=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nooiwa@miraclelinux.com \
--cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).