From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Don Fry Subject: patch acceptance question Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 08:21:36 -0700 Message-ID: <1247152896.29603.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from vms173005pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.5]:52483 "EHLO vms173005pub.verizon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752975AbZGIPWJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jul 2009 11:22:09 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([96.253.170.133]) by vms173005.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPA id <0KMI0006CTC0KZY6@vms173005.mailsrvcs.net> for netdev@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 10:21:37 -0500 (CDT) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: I was surprised today to see a change to pcnet32.c in 2.6.31-rc2-git4 which maybe I missed yesterday on netdev. Most of the changes are okay, but one in particular will result in some ugly printing. What is the path that (probably janitorial) changes take that get included in mainline? Had I seen it before it went in I would have commented on it then. Old: pcnet32: PCnet/FAST+ 79C972 at 0x1020, 00:0c:46:53:8d:0c tx_start_pt(0x0c00):~220 bytes, BCR18(9861):BurstWrEn BurstRdEn NoUFlow SRAMSIZE=0x1700, SRAM_BND=0x0800, assigned IRQ 21. New: pcnet32: PCnet/FAST+ 79C972 at 0x1020, 00:0c:46:53:8d:0c<6> tx_start_pt (0x0c00):~220 bytes, BCR18(9861):BurstWrEn BurstRdEn NoUFlow SRAMSIZE=0x1700, SRAM_BND=0x0800, assigned IRQ 21. Thanks, Don Fry