From: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
To: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>,
libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org,
Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, dsd@laptop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libertas: name the network device wlan%d
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:31:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1250094662.31650.24.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090811143401.GD2684@tuxdriver.com>
On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 10:34 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 04:13:32PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> > Devices created by the libertas driver are currently called eth%d. Which
> > is wrong, because the device does not at all have anything to do with
> > Ethernet. And it is also confusing when used on devices with more than
> > one network device.
> >
> > Fix this by calling it wlan%d.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
> > Cc: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
> > Cc: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
> > Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
>
> I'm fine with changing it, but it isn't really wrong either -- it's
> just a name, and afterall in most cases all the user will see is
> ethernet frames.
>
> Comments from the libertas driver crew?
I don't care either way, it's completely historical. Most of the
fullmac drivers used 'eth' back when. Might want to get buy-in from the
OLPC crew since they probably have the most deployed units using
libertas (cc-ed Daniel Drake).
Daniel, is it a problem for you guys if the libertas wifi interface name
went from 'eth' -> 'wlan' ? Mesh name would be unchanged.
Dan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-12 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-11 14:13 [PATCH] libertas: name the network device wlan%d Daniel Mack
2009-08-11 14:34 ` John W. Linville
2009-08-12 7:56 ` Bob Dunlop
2009-08-12 8:55 ` Daniel Mack
2009-08-12 16:31 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2009-08-13 3:48 ` Daniel Drake
2009-08-13 17:28 ` Dan Williams
[not found] ` <20090811151051.GA18186@guralp.com>
2009-08-11 15:33 ` Daniel Mack
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1250094662.31650.24.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=dcbw@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@caiaq.de \
--cc=dsd@laptop.org \
--cc=libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roel.kluin@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox