netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Rosenboom <jens@mcbone.net>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	chuck.lever@oracle.com, brian.haley@hp.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] lib/vsprintf.c: Add "%pI6c" - print pointer as compressed ipv6 address
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:48:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1250603336.16632.49.camel@fnki-nb00130> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1250548184.4488.6.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>

On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 15:29 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 17:18 +0200, Jens Rosenboom wrote: 
[...]
> > Also I'm wondering whether it makes sense to pull the format code
> > checking into all the sub-routines. 
> 
> It isn't clear to me what you're asking for.
> 
> > It might be easier to maintain if it 
> > is all kept together in pointer().
> 
> Can you explain more thoroughly please?
> 
> If you mean not passing const char *fmt to the sub-routines,
> I think not doing so makes it harder to maintain and extend.
> 
> I think it will be useful to extend the 'S' resource_string
> capability to use fmt to allow specific bits to be selected
> of the resource identifier to be printed.
> 
> See the idea in:  http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/17/105

You were right in assuming the intention of my seemingly badly explained
comments, but in this context I agree with you, that it makes sense the
way you did it.

> Here's the modified patch with your suggestions:
> 

Ran it through my test-cases and they all look fine.

Tested-by: Jens Rosenboom <jens@mcbone.net>


  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-18 13:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-12 15:39 [RFC] ipv6: Change %pI6 format to output compacted addresses? Jens Rosenboom
2009-08-13  1:33 ` Brian Haley
2009-08-13 10:39   ` Joe Perches
2009-08-13 13:52     ` Jens Rosenboom
2009-08-13 15:07       ` Joe Perches
2009-08-13 14:39   ` Jens Rosenboom
2009-08-13 15:14     ` Chuck Lever
2009-08-13 16:27     ` Brian Haley
2009-08-13 18:10       ` Joe Perches
2009-08-13 18:15         ` Chuck Lever
2009-08-13 18:21           ` Joe Perches
2009-08-13 18:39             ` Chuck Lever
2009-08-13 19:05               ` Joe Perches
2009-08-13 20:24                 ` Brian Haley
2009-08-13 20:28               ` Brian Haley
2009-08-13 20:24         ` Brian Haley
2009-08-13 20:34           ` Joe Perches
2009-08-13 21:02             ` Chuck Lever
2009-08-13 21:13               ` Joe Perches
2009-08-13 23:31                 ` David Miller
2009-08-14  6:22                   ` Jens Rosenboom
2009-08-14  7:15                     ` David Miller
2009-08-14  8:15                       ` Jens Rosenboom
2009-08-14 20:12                         ` David Miller
2009-08-15 15:24                           ` [PATCH] lib/vsprintf.c: Add "%pI6c" - print pointer as compressed ipv6 address Joe Perches
2009-08-16  4:10                             ` [RFC PATCH] lib/vsprintf.c: Add struct sockaddr * "%pN<foo>" output Joe Perches
2009-08-19 14:26                               ` Chuck Lever
2009-08-19 20:44                                 ` [RFC PATCH V2] " Joe Perches
2009-08-19 22:20                                   ` Chuck Lever
2009-08-19 22:36                                     ` Joe Perches
2009-08-19 23:00                                       ` Chuck Lever
2009-08-20  4:24                                       ` Joe Perches
2009-08-20  4:29                                         ` David Miller
2009-08-17 15:18                             ` [PATCH] lib/vsprintf.c: Add "%pI6c" - print pointer as compressed ipv6 address Jens Rosenboom
2009-08-17 22:29                               ` [PATCH V2] " Joe Perches
2009-08-18 13:48                                 ` Jens Rosenboom [this message]
2009-08-29  7:20                                   ` David Miller
2009-08-14 16:26                 ` [RFC] ipv6: Change %pI6 format to output compacted addresses? Chuck Lever
2009-08-13 14:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-13 14:30   ` Jens Rosenboom

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1250603336.16632.49.camel@fnki-nb00130 \
    --to=jens@mcbone.net \
    --cc=brian.haley@hp.com \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).