From: DDD <Dongdong.deng@windriver.com>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netpoll: WARN_ONCE for start_xmit returns with interrupts enabled
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:44:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1250765040.17891.91.camel@dengdd-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1250678596.3937.182.camel@calx>
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 05:43 -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 18:43 +0800, DDD wrote:
> > The NETPOLL API requires that interrupts remain disabled in
> > netpoll_send_skb().
> >
> > Add a WARN_ONCE when ndo_start_xmit returns with interrupts enabled
> > in netpoll_send_skb().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dongdong Deng <dongdong.deng@windriver.com>
> > ---
> > net/core/netpoll.c | 6 ++++++
> > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/core/netpoll.c b/net/core/netpoll.c
> > index df30feb..d38103f 100644
> > --- a/net/core/netpoll.c
> > +++ b/net/core/netpoll.c
> > @@ -319,6 +319,12 @@ static void netpoll_send_skb(struct netpoll *np, struct sk_buff *skb)
> >
> > udelay(USEC_PER_POLL);
> > }
> > +
> > + WARN_ONCE(!irqs_disabled(),
> > + KERN_WARNING "netpoll_send_skb(): [net driver %s]"
> > + "ndo_start_xmit() shouldn't return with interrupts"
> > + "enabled!", dev->name);
>
> Hmm, perhaps:
>
> "netpoll_send_skb(): %s enabled interrupts in poll (%pF)\n",
> dev->name, ops->ndo_start_xmit
>
> That'll give us a real function name and maybe even a module name.
Thanks, I will modify it as your suggestions.
When I test the WRAN_ONCE, I find that some net drivers still have this problem,
such as using local_irq_disable/local_irq_enable in ndo_start_xmit() or other cases.
I will do an new patch and hope it could fix this problem completely in all the net drivers that support NETPOLL.
I check the drivers that support NETPOLL one by one again(almost 100 drivers),
and following drivers's fix will be included by my patch:
1: ixp2000/ixpdev.c : 66 local_irq_disable
2: fec_mpc52xx.c : 319 spin_unlock_irq
3: macb.c:602 : 638 spin_unlock_irq
4: mlx4/en_netdev.c : 448
mlx4_en_xmit() -> mlx4_en_xmit_poll() -> spin_trylock_irq
5: smc91x.c
It seems that there is a lots work to let smc91x work well with netpoll.
Thanks,
Dongdong
>
parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-20 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <1250678596.3937.182.camel@calx>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1250765040.17891.91.camel@dengdd-desktop \
--to=dongdong.deng@windriver.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox